Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Right ventricular longitudinal systolic strain as a predictor of new onset heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in hypertensive patients

Title: Right ventricular longitudinal systolic strain as a predictor of new onset heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in hypertensive patients
Authors: Marketou, M; Kochiadakis, G; Patrianakos, A; Maragkoudakis, S; Theodosaki, O; Zervakis, S; Anastasiou, I; Fragkiadakis, K; Plevritaki, A; Papadaki, S; Parthenakis, F
Source: European Heart Journal ; volume 42, issue Supplement_1 ; ISSN 0195-668X 1522-9645
Publisher Information: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Year: 2021
Description: Purpose Accurate assessment of right ventricular (RV) systolic function is important, as it is an established prognostic marker in cardiac diseases. Speckle-tracking echocardiography is a sensitive tool for detection of subclinical left ventricular impairment in essential hypertension. We associated RV function using longitudinal peak systolic strain (GLS) in patients with essential hypertension with the risk of future development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods We performed a retrospective observational study that included 452 patients with essential hypertension (266 males, aged 63±18 years) and 175 normotensives (100 males, aged 66±15 years). Standard echocardiography was performed at the initial visit. 2D speckle tracking echocardiography with evaluation of longitudinal strain in each segment of the RV (basal: RVLS-B; mid: RVLS-M, apical: RVLS-A) and global RV free-wall strain (RVLS-G) were also performed. We studied the cases of new onset HFpEF in hypertensive patients. Results The median follow up was 85 months (22–122). RVLS-G, RVLS-B and RVLS-M were significantly impaired in hypertensives compared to controls (RVLS-G: −16.1±9.7 vs −20.0±5.1, RVLS-B: −11.7±3.7 vs −20.6±3.3, RVLS-M: −16.3±5.4 vs −20.7±4.9, p
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2321
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2321; https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article-pdf/42/Supplement_1/ehab724.2321/41059862/ehab724.2321.pdf
Rights: https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
Accession Number: edsbas.9F69633A
Database: BASE