| Title: |
Long acting progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pill for preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain: the PRE-EMPT pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial |
| Authors: |
Cooper, Kevin G.; Bhattacharya, Siladitya; Daniels, Jane P.; Horne, Andrew W.; Clark, T. Justin; Saridogan, Ertan; Cheed, Versha; Pirie, Danielle; Melyda, Melyda; Monahan, Mark; Roberts, Tracy E.; Cox, Emma; Stubbs, Clive; Middleton, Lee J.; on behalf of the PRE-EMPT Collaborative Group |
| Publisher Information: |
BMJ Publishing Group |
| Publication Year: |
2024 |
| Collection: |
University of Nottingham: Repository@Nottingham |
| Description: |
Objectives: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of long acting progestogens compared with the combined oral contraceptive pill in preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain. Design: The PRE-EMPT (preventing recurrence of endometriosis) pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial. Setting: 34 UK hospitals. Participants: 405 women of reproductive age undergoing conservative surgery for endometriosis. Interventions: Participants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio using a secure internet facility to a long acting progestogen (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system) or the combined oral contraceptive pill. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was pain measured three years after randomisation using the pain domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP-30) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes (evaluated at six months, one, two, and three years) included the four core and six modular domains of the EHP-30, and treatment failure (further therapeutic surgery or second line medical treatment). Results: 405 women were randomised to receive a long acting progestogen (n=205) or combined oral contraceptive pill (n=200). At three years, there was no difference in pain scores between the groups (adjusted mean difference −0.8, 95% confidence interval −5.7 to 4.2, P=0.76), which had improved by around 40% in both groups compared with preoperative values (an average of 24 and 23 points for long acting progestogen and combined oral contraceptive pill groups, respectively). Most of the other domains of the EHP-30 also showed improvement at all time points compared with preoperative scores, without evidence of any differences between groups. Women randomised to a long acting progestogen underwent fewer surgical procedures or second line treatments compared with those randomised to the combined oral contraceptive pill group (73 v 97; hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 1.00). Conclusions: Postoperative prescription of a long acting ... |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| Relation: |
https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/35142002; BMJ; Volume 385 |
| DOI: |
10.1136/bmj-2023-079006 |
| Availability: |
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-079006; https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/file/35142002/1/Long%20acting%20progestogens%20versus%20combined%20oral%20contraceptive%20pill; https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/35142002 |
| Rights: |
openAccess |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.A1AD86CF |
| Database: |
BASE |