Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

What Type of Prostate Cancer Is Systematically Overlooked by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? An Analysis from the PROMIS Cohort

Title: What Type of Prostate Cancer Is Systematically Overlooked by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? An Analysis from the PROMIS Cohort
Authors: Norris, JM; Carmona Echeverria, LM; Bott, SRJ; Brown, LC; Burns-Cox, N; Dudderidge, T; El-Shater Bosaily, A; Frangou, E; Freeman, A; Ghei, M; Henderson, A; Hindley, RG; Kaplan, RS; Kirkham, A; Oldroyd, R; Parker, C; Persad, R; Punwani, S; Rosario, DJ; Shergill, IS; Stavrinides, V; Winkler, M; Whitaker, HC; Ahmed, HU; Emberton, M
Source: European Urology (2020)
Publisher Information: Elsevier BV
Publication Year: 2020
Collection: University College London: UCL Discovery
Subject Terms: False negative magnetic resonance imaging; Undetected cancer; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; PROMISProstate cancer
Description: Background: All risk stratification strategies in cancer overlook a spectrum of disease. The Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS) provides a unique opportunity to explore cancers that are overlooked by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Objective: To summarise attributes of cancers that are systematically overlooked by mpMRI. Design, setting, and participants: PROMIS tested performance of mpMRI and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy, using 5 mm template mapping (TPM) biopsy as the reference standard. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Outcomes were overall and maximum Gleason scores, maximum cancer core length (MCCL), and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD). Cancer attributes were compared between cancers that were overlooked and those that were detected. Results and limitations: Of men with cancer, 7% (17/230; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4–12%) had significant disease overlooked by mpMRI according to definition 1 (Gleason ≥ 4 + 3 of any length or MCCL ≥ 6 mm of any grade) and 13% (44/331; 95% CI 9.8–17%) according to definition 2 (Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 of any length or MCCL ≥ 4 mm). In comparison, TRUS-guided biopsy overlooked 52% (119/230; 95% CI 45–58%) of significant disease by definition 1 and 40% (132/331; 95% CI 35–45%) by definition 2. Prostate cancers undetected by mpMRI had significantly lower overall and maximum Gleason scores (p = 0.0007; p < 0.0001) and shorter MCCL (median difference: 3 mm [5 vs 8 mm], p < 0.0001; 95% CI 1–3) than cancers that were detected. No tumours with overall Gleason score > 3 + 4 (Gleason Grade Groups 3–5; 95% CI 0–6.4%) or maximum Gleason score > 4 + 3 (Gleason Grade Groups 4–5; 95% CI 0–8.0%) on TPM biopsy were undetected by mpMRI. Application of a PSAD threshold of 0.15 reduced the proportion of men with undetected cancer to 5% (12/230; 95% CI 2.7–8.9%) for definition 1 and 9% (30/331; 95% CI 6.2–13%) for definition 2. Application of a PSAD threshold of 0.10 reduced the proportion of men with undetected disease to 3% ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: text
Language: English
Relation: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10096926/
Availability: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10096926/1/1-s2.0-S030228382030261X-main.pdf; https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10096926/
Rights: open
Accession Number: edsbas.A222763E
Database: BASE