Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Identifying research priorities in newborn medicine: a Delphi study of parents’ views

Title: Identifying research priorities in newborn medicine: a Delphi study of parents’ views
Authors: Katherine J Lee; Sharon Goldfeld; Alicia J Spittle; Jeanie LY Cheong; Deanne K Thompson; Lex W Doyle; Peter J Anderson; Marta Thio; Jennifer A Dawson; Alice C Burnett; Gehan Roberts; Rod W Hunt; Sarah Mcintyre; Kim M Dalziel; Susan E Jacobs; Louise S Owen; Rodney W Hunt; Karli Treyvaud; Abbey L Eeles; Clare Delany; Rosemarie A Boland; Alex Aldis; Louise Pallot; Tien Polonidis; Krista Rust; Renae Allen
Source: BMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss 11 (2021)
Publisher Information: BMJ Publishing Group
Publication Year: 2021
Collection: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Subject Terms: Medicine
Description: Objective Neonatal conditions can have lifelong implications for the health and well-being of children and families. Traditionally, parents and patients have not been included in shaping the agenda for research and yet they are profoundly affected by the neonatal experience and its consequences. This study aimed to identify consensus research priorities among parents/patients of newborn medicine in Australia and New Zealand.Design Parents/patients with experience of neonatal care in Australia and New Zealand completed an online Delphi study to identify research priorities across four epochs (neonatal admission, early childhood, childhood/adolescence and adulthood). Parents/patients first generated key challenges in each of these epochs. Through inductive thematic analysis, recurring topics were identified and research questions generated. Parents/patients rated these questions in terms of priorities and a list of questions consistently rated as high priority was identified.Participants 393 individuals participated, 388 parents whose children had received neonatal care and 5 adults who had received neonatal care themselves.Results Many research questions were identified as high-priority across the lifespan. These included how to best support parental mental health, relationships between parents and neonatal clinical staff (including involvement in care and communication), bonding and the parent–child relationship, improving neonatal medical care and addressing long-term impacts on child health and neurodevelopment.Conclusions Parents with experience of newborn medicine have strong, clear and recurring research priorities spanning neonatal care practices, psychological and other impacts on families, and impacts on child development. These findings should guide neonatal research efforts. In addition to generating new knowledge, improved translation of existing evidence to parents is also needed.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/11/e044836.full; https://doaj.org/toc/2044-6055; https://doaj.org/article/0e2471fe1f794d68a2ee1ee6bbab9aed
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044836
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044836; https://doaj.org/article/0e2471fe1f794d68a2ee1ee6bbab9aed
Accession Number: edsbas.A77FC53D
Database: BASE