Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the general population by three prevailing rapid antigen tests:cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study

Title: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the general population by three prevailing rapid antigen tests:cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study
Authors: Venekamp, Roderick P; Veldhuijzen,Irene K; Moons, Karel G M; van den Bijllaardt,Wouter; Pas, Suzan D; Lodder,Esther B; Molenkamp,Richard; Igloi,Zsofi; Wijers,Constantijn; Dos Santos,Claudy Oliveira; Debast,Sylvia B; Bruins,Marjan J; Polad,Khaled; Nagel-Imming,Carla R S; Han,Wanda G H; van de Wijgert, Janneke H H M; van den Hof,Susan; Schuit, Ewoud; HAG Onderzoek; Child Health; Infection & Immunity; JC onderzoeksprogramma Infectious Diseases; Epi Methoden; Cancer; JC onderzoeksprogramma Methodology; Epi Infectieziekten Team 1b; Epi Methoden Team 4
Publication Year: 2022
Subject Terms: COVID-19; Diagnostic accuracy; Rapid antigen tests; SARS-CoV-2; General Medicine
Description: BACKGROUND: Rapid antigen diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) are the most widely used point-of-care tests for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection. Since the accuracy may have altered by changes in SARS-CoV-2 epidemiology, indications for testing, sampling and testing procedures, and roll-out of COVID-19 vaccination, we evaluated the performance of three prevailing SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDTs. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we consecutively enrolled individuals aged >16 years presenting for SARS-CoV-2 testing at three Dutch public health service COVID-19 test sites. In the first phase, participants underwent either BD-Veritor System (Becton Dickinson), PanBio (Abbott), or SD-Biosensor (Roche Diagnostics) testing with routine sampling procedures. In a subsequent phase, participants underwent SD-Biosensor testing with a less invasive sampling method (combined oropharyngeal-nasal [OP-N] swab). Diagnostic accuracies were assessed against molecular testing. RESULTS: Six thousand nine hundred fifty-five of 7005 participants (99%) with results from both an Ag-RDT and a molecular reference test were analysed. SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and overall sensitivities were 13% (188/1441) and 69% (129/188, 95% CI 62-75) for BD-Veritor, 8% (173/2056) and 69% (119/173, 61-76) for PanBio, and 12% (215/1769) and 74% (160/215, 68-80) for SD-Biosensor with routine sampling and 10% (164/1689) and 75% (123/164, 68-81) for SD-Biosensor with OP-N sampling. In those symptomatic or asymptomatic at sampling, sensitivities were 72-83% and 54-56%, respectively. Above a viral load cut-off (≥5.2 log10 SARS-CoV-2 E-gene copies/mL), sensitivities were 86% (125/146, 79-91) for BD-Veritor, 89% (108/121, 82-94) for PanBio, and 88% (160/182, 82-92) for SD-Biosensor with routine sampling and 84% (118/141, 77-89) with OP-N sampling. Specificities were >99% for all tests in most analyses. Sixty-one per cent of false-negative Ag-RDT participants returned for testing within 14 days (median: 3 days, interquartile range 3) of whom 90% tested positive. CONCLUSIONS: ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: text/plain
Language: English
ISSN: 1741-7015
Relation: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/445839
Availability: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/445839
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.A7F5804F
Database: BASE