| Description: |
Dementia is a burgeoning global problem. Novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics beyond volumetry may bring new insight and aid clinical trial evaluation of interventions early in the Alzheimer's disease course to complement existing imaging and clinical metrics. To determine whether: (i) normalized regional sodium-MRI values (Na-SI) are better predictors of neurocognitive status than volumetry (ii) cerebral amyloid PET status improves modelling. Nondemented older adult (>60 years) volunteers of known Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog11), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) neurocognitive test scores, ApolipoproteinE (APOE) e4 +/- cerebral amyloid PET status were prospectively recruited for 3T sodium-MRI brain scans. Left and right hippocampal, entorhinal and precuneus volumes and Na-SI (using the proportional intensity scaling normalization method with field inhomogeneity and partial volume corrections) were obtained after segmentation and co-registration of 3D-T1-weighted proton images. Descriptive statistics, correlation and best-subset regression analyses were performed. In our 76 nondemented participants (mean(standard deviation) age 75(5) years; woman 47(62%); cognitively unimpaired 54/76(71%), mildly cognitively impaired 22/76(29%)), left hippocampal Na-SI, not volume, was preferentially in the best models for predicting MMSE (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.19(Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.07,0.53), P-value = 0.001) and ADAS-Cog11 (Beta(B) = 1.2(CI = 0.28,2.1), P-value = 0.01) scores. In the entorhinal analysis, right entorhinal Na-SI, not volume, was preferentially selected in the best model for predicting ADAS-Cog11 (B = 0.94(CI = 0.11,1.8), P-value = 0.03). While right entorhinal Na-SI and volume were both selected for MMSE modelling (Na-SI OR = 0.23(CI = 0.09,0.6), P-value = 0.003; volume OR = 2.6(CI = 1.0,6.6), P-value = 0.04), independently, Na-SI explained more of the variance (Na-SI R 2 = 10.3; volume R 2 = 7.5). No ... |