Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Multicomponent interdisciplinary group intervention for self-management of fibromyalgia: a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial.

Title: Multicomponent interdisciplinary group intervention for self-management of fibromyalgia: a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial.
Authors: Patricia Bourgault; Anaïs Lacasse; Serge Marchand; Roxanne Courtemanche-Harel; Jacques Charest; Isabelle Gaumond; Juliana Barcellos de Souza; Manon Choinière
Source: PLoS ONE, Vol 10, Iss 5, p e0126324 (2015)
Publisher Information: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Year: 2015
Collection: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Subject Terms: Medicine; Science
Description: Background This study evaluated the efficacy of the PASSAGE Program, a structured multicomponent interdisciplinary group intervention for the self-management of FMS. Methods A mixed-methods randomized controlled trial (intervention (INT) vs. waitlist (WL)) was conducted with patients suffering from FMS. Data were collected at baseline (T0), at the end of the intervention (T1), and 3 months later (T2). The primary outcome was change in pain intensity (0-10). Secondary outcomes were fibromyalgia severity, pain interference, sleep quality, pain coping strategies, depression, health-related quality of life, patient global impression of change (PGIC), and perceived pain relief. Qualitative group interviews with a subset of patients were also conducted. Complete data from T0 to T2 were available for 43 patients. Results The intervention had a statistically significant impact on the three PGIC measures. At the end of the PASSAGE Program, the percentages of patients who perceived overall improvement in their pain levels, functioning and quality of life were significantly higher in the INT Group (73%, 55%, 77% respectively) than in the WL Group (8%, 12%, 20%). The same differences were observed 3 months post-intervention (Intervention group: 62%, 43%, 38% vs Waitlist Group: 13%, 13%, 9%). The proportion of patients who reported ≥ 50% pain relief was also significantly higher in the INT Group at the end of the intervention (36% vs 12%) and 3 months post-intervention (33% vs 4%). Results of the qualitative analysis were in line with the quantitative findings regarding the efficacy of the intervention. The improvement, however, was not reflected in the primary outcome and other secondary outcome measures. Conclusion The PASSAGE Program was effective in helping FMS patients gain a sense of control over their symptoms. We suggest including PGIC in future clinical trials on FMS as they appear to capture important aspects of the patients' experience. Trial registration International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126324; https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203; https://doaj.org/article/0c0494b4e65e43f7999e158df39f053d
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126324
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126324; https://doaj.org/article/0c0494b4e65e43f7999e158df39f053d
Accession Number: edsbas.A8C3E0CF
Database: BASE