Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Dimensional Changes After Different Alveolar Ridge Preservation Techniques for Posterior Region: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

Title: Dimensional Changes After Different Alveolar Ridge Preservation Techniques for Posterior Region: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Authors: Sandoli Arroteia, Leticia; Lopes, Matheus Paschoaletto; Réa, Marcela Tarosso; Vieira e Oliveira, Thalita R.; Oliveira, Matheus L.; de Faveri, Marcelo; Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine; Queiroz, Lucas Araujo; Casati, Marcio Zaffalon; Casarin, Renato Corrêa Viana
Contributors: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Source: Journal of Clinical Periodontology ; ISSN 0303-6979 1600-051X
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Aim Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) after tooth extraction aims to maintain ridge dimensions for future implant placement. However, limited evidence is available for posterior sites. We evaluated the dimensional changes in posterior extraction sockets using four approaches: modified free gingival graft (MFGG); MFGG with xenograft (MFGG + XG); guided bone regeneration with titanium membrane and xenograft (TM + XG); and unassisted socket healing (USH). Materials and Methods Patients requiring posterior tooth extraction were randomly assigned to one of four groups ( n = 22/group). Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed immediately after operation and at 6 months to assess vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge changes and implant‐related outcomes. Results Significant dimensional changes occurred in all groups ( p < 0.05). The TM + XG and MFGG + XG groups showed better preservation of vertical ridge dimensions than the USH and MFGG groups ( p < 0.05). Horizontal reductions were significant in all groups ( p < 0.05). USH presented the highest sinus floor elevation rate (67% of maxillary cases) and the most frequent use of short implants (< 8.5 mm; 71%). Postoperative pain was significantly greater in the MFGG groups compared to the USH group ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Bone grafting with MFGG or a titanium membrane enhanced ridge preservation and reduced the need for additional surgery compared to USH. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06081296
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.70004
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.70004; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jcpe.70004
Rights: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.AA543121
Database: BASE