Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Immunity to Varicella Zoster Virus in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024)

Title: Immunity to Varicella Zoster Virus in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024)
Authors: Matteo Riccò; Pietro Ferraro; Salvatore Zaffina; Vincenzo Camisa; Federico Marchesi; Francesca Fortin Franzoso; Cosimo Ligori; Daniel Fiacchini; Nicola Magnavita; Silvio Tafuri
Source: Vaccines ; Volume 12 ; Issue 9 ; Pages: 1021
Publisher Information: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: MDPI Open Access Publishing
Subject Terms: chickenpox; shingles; varicella zoster; varicella zoster vaccine; healthcare workers
Description: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are occupationally exposed to varicella zoster virus (VZV), and their inappropriate vaccination status could contribute to an outbreak involving both professionals and the patients they care for, with a potential impact on the general population. Therefore, since 2007, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that all HCWs have evidence of immunity against varicella. The present meta-analysis was therefore designed to collect the available evidence on the seronegative status of VZV among HCWs. PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched without backward limit for articles reporting on the seroprevalence of VZV among HCWs, and all articles meeting the inclusion criteria were included in a random-effect meta-analysis model. From 1744 initial entries, a total of 58 articles were included in the quantitative analysis (publication range: 1988 to 2024), for a pooled sample of 71,720 HCWs. Moreover, the included studies reported on seroprevalence data on measles (N = 36,043 HCWs) and rubella (N = 22,086 HCWs). Eventually, the pooled seronegative status for VZV was estimated to be 5.72% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 4.59 to 7.10) compared to 6.91% (95% CI 4.79 to 9.87) for measles and 7.21% (5.36 to 9.64) for rubella, with a greater risk among subjects younger than 30 years at the time of the survey (risk ratio [RR] 1.434, 95% CI 1.172 to 1.756). Interestingly, medical history of either VZV infection/vaccination had low diagnostic performances (sensitivity 76.00%; specificity 60.12%; PPV of 96.12% but PNV of 18.64%). In summary, the available data suggest that newly hired HCWs are increasingly affected by low immunization rates for VZV but also for measles and rubella, stressing the importance of systematically testing test newly hired workers for all components of the measles–pertussis–rubella–varicella vaccine.
Document Type: text
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: Vaccines Against Tropical and Other Infectious Diseases; https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12091021
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12091021
Availability: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12091021
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.AAF1D6A0
Database: BASE