Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

The LTAR Common Experiment at Upper Chesapeake Bay: Integrated

Title: The LTAR Common Experiment at Upper Chesapeake Bay: Integrated
Authors: Soder, Kathy J.; Dell, Curtis J.; Adler, Paul R.; Laboski, Carrie A. M.; Williamson, Benjamin C.
Source: Journal of Environmental Quality ; volume 53, issue 6, page 832-838 ; ISSN 0047-2425 1537-2537
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Corn ( Zea mays ) crops harvested as grain in autumn do not provide opportunity for cover crop establishment, which may be remedied by interseeding cover crops into growing corn. Grazing cover crops after corn grain harvest could provide added revenues and increase nutrient cycling in the system while providing additional ecosystem services. However, tradeoffs between cash crop productivity and cover crop inclusion, and use as grazed forage, are not fully understood. This 4‐year Long‐Term Agroecosystem Research Integrated Common Experiment project evaluated the effect of interseeding cereal rye ( Secale cereale ) into corn for grazing after corn grain harvest on corn grain yield and late‐season grazing. Cereal rye was interseeded into corn in early June. After corn grain harvest, six paddocks at each location were randomly allotted to grazed (GRAZ) or not grazed (NG). The GRAZ paddocks were grazed with beef cattle in late autumn and again in early spring if regrowth allowed. Paddocks were flown with an unmanned aerial system (UAS) to characterize spatial forage yield and quality. Cereal rye provided an additional 20–30 grazing days in the autumn for 24 beef cows on 4.8 ha. Early spring growth shows potential to provide even greater forage yields than autumn, but growth is less dependable. Corn grain yields did not decrease except in 2019 (dry year) when yields were 40% lower. There were no significant differences in soil health indicators between GRAZ and NG paddocks. The UAS shows promise as a tool for monitoring forage yield and quality and optimizing grazing management.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/jeq2.20591
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20591
Rights: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.AB127752
Database: BASE