| Title: |
P-1021. Comparative Clinical profile, Anti-Fungal resistance rates and in-hospital mortality in hospitalized patients with Candidaemia caused by Candida Auris versus Non-Auris Candida in a tertiary-care centre |
| Authors: |
Nagvekar, Vasant; Bubna, Anusha; shivaprakash, Shashikala; Shukala, Akash; Mohanka, Ravi; rao, prashtana; Patel, Neha; Vaity, Charudatt; Malakavalpil, Bindu; Pandit, Rahul; Pillai, Preeti; Borde, Omkar; Mundra, Neetu |
| Source: |
Open Forum Infectious Diseases ; volume 12, issue Supplement_1 ; ISSN 2328-8957 |
| Publisher Information: |
Oxford University Press (OUP) |
| Publication Year: |
2025 |
| Description: |
Background Candidemia, a severest manifestation of invasive candidiasis, often encountered in intensive care units (ICUs) is predisposed by prolonged ICU-stay, immunosuppression or mechanical ventilation. In India, while various species of Candida (C. tropicalis, C. albicans, C. auris and others) are involved in candidemia, C. auris is particularly known for displaying higher anti-fungal resistance. We investigated, whether there was a difference in the clinical pattern of candidemia caused by C. auris vs non-auris Candida in our tertiary-care centre.Figure 1.Comorbidities among patients with candidaemia: C. auris group versus non-auris candida group CANDIDA AURIS VS NON-AURIS CLINICAL RISK FACTORS Methods The analysis involved 65 unique episodes (one patient per episode) of documented candidemia in our tertiary-care centre during January 2022 to April 2024. The clinical data was retrieved from the blinded hospital records. The day of admission of patients in to ICU was considered as hospital day-1. Results Among 65 episodes, 17 (26.2%) and 48 (73.8%) were that of C. auris and non-auris candida, respectively. The time to blood culture positivity was longer with C. auris cohort compared to non-auris candida cohort (median hospital days 27 vs 19). Total hospitalization days (median) were 49 and 15.5, P value 0.002 respectively. In-hospital mortality was 58% in C. auris group and 62.5% in non-auris candida group. There was more proportion of cancer patients in non-auris candida cohort while use of immunosuppressive drugs was more frequent in C. auris cohort (Figure 1). Resistance rates to fluconazole, amphotericin, and echinocandins were higher in C. auris group (94.5% vs 25%; 70.5% vs 6.3%; 11% vs 2.1%, respectively)..Total Parenteral Nutrition > 5 days (26.2% vs 73.9%) P value 0.38, Transplant Patients (47.05% vs 14.58%) , immunosuppressive drugs (64.7% vs 39.6% ) P value 0.07 and Mechanical Ventilation (88.2% vs 52.1%) P value 0.008 respectively. Conclusion C. Auris has emerged as a notorious Non ... |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| DOI: |
10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1211 |
| Availability: |
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1211; https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article-pdf/12/Supplement_1/ofae631.1211/61677301/ofae631.1211.pdf |
| Rights: |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.AE6619A3 |
| Database: |
BASE |