Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Central reassessment of GH concentrations measured at local treatment centers in children with impaired growth: consequences for patient management

Title: Central reassessment of GH concentrations measured at local treatment centers in children with impaired growth: consequences for patient management
Authors: Hauffa, BP; Lehmann, N; Bettendorf, M; Mehls, O; Dorr, HG; Partsch, CJ; Schwarz, HP; Stahnke, N; Steinkamp, H; Said, E; Sander, S; Ranke, MB
Source: European Journal of Endocrinology ; page 291-297 ; ISSN 0804-4643 1479-683X
Publisher Information: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Year: 2004
Description: OBJECTIVE: GH deficiency is diagnosed in children if serum GH fails to rise above a predefined cutoff value in response to at least two stimuli. Diagnostic decisions based on this testing are highly variable between centers and depend on the GH assays used. Considering the large spectrum of commercially available GH assays, we wanted to evaluate the agreement between assays, and to test whether assay-related variability of diagnostic decisions could be reduced by reassessment of peak GH concentrations in a reference center. DESIGN: We reanalysed 699 peak GH serum samples obtained after GH testing of 382 children and adolescents from 19 centers using three reference assays and compared these results with those obtained with the local assays. A subgroup of 132 patients tested with the combination of insulin hypoglycemia test and arginine test was evaluated for changes in the assignment to the diagnostic group of GH deficiency. RESULTS: The mean difference between methods ranged from 5.4 to 10.3 mU/l, slopes of the regression lines from 1.28 to 1.65. Significant non-linearity was detected in five of six assay comparisons, indicating that most assay results cannot be interconverted by the use of a factor. Overall agreement between reference and local assays was only moderate. Significant changes in diagnostic assignment occurred when different assays were used on the same patient (P
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: unknown
DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1500291
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1500291; https://eje.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/eje/150/3/291.xml
Accession Number: edsbas.B269FB9
Database: BASE