Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Rationales for Prehabilitation Programs in Patients Preparing for Oncologic Surgery:A Systematic Review

Title: Rationales for Prehabilitation Programs in Patients Preparing for Oncologic Surgery:A Systematic Review
Authors: Akdemir, Emine; Groen,Wim G; Sweegers,Maike G; Bongers,Bart C; May, Anne M; Stuiver, Martijn M; van Harten,Wim H; Epi Kanker Team B; Epi Kanker; Cancer; JC onderzoeksprogramma Cancer
Publication Year: 2026
Subject Terms: Oncological surgery; Physical exercise; Prehabilitation; Rationales; Systematic review; Surgery; Oncology
Description: BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation aims to improve patients' resilience to surgery and enhance postoperative recovery. Understanding rationales for prehabilitation content may identify opportunities for program optimization. This systematic review provides an overview of rationales, intervention, and outcomes used in prehabilitation studies in oncological populations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We searched the databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus on 1 March 2024. Comparative prehabilitation studies including patients undergoing oncological surgery were included. Prehabilitation was defined as a preoperative exercise program, alone or combined with other components, with the explicit aim of improving postoperative outcomes. Extracted outcomes included reported rationales, program content, and primary endpoints. RESULTS: In total, 140 studies (N = 24,925 patients) were included. Most (N = 125, 89%) reported a rationale for improving physical fitness, particularly cardiorespiratory fitness (N = 97, 69%). Psychological (N = 46, 33%) and metabolic (N = 28, 20%) rationales were reported less frequently. Rationales for specific attributes (e.g., intensity) were rarely described. Exercise was predominantly supervised (N = 57, 41%), and of these supervised sessions, most were prescribed three times per week (N = 25, 44%). Almost all studies (N = 121, 86%) included anaerobic exercise component at moderate-intensity continuous (N = 39, 32%) or high-intensity interval (N = 34, 28%) mode. Intended duration varied from 1 to 12 weeks. Most reported primary endpoints were surgical outcomes (e.g., complications) (N = 59, 42%), although definitions varied. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperatively improving physical fitness is a widely used rationale for prehabilitation; however, studies are implicit in rationales for specific program components. Content and duration of prehabilitation showed considerable variation, often determined by feasibility and time to surgery. Prehabilitation studies could benefit from standardized outcomes. Adopting a more ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 1068-9265
Relation: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/469109
Availability: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/469109
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.B31F04DB
Database: BASE