| Title: |
Inhuman animals: moving dehumanization into the domain of human–animal relations |
| Authors: |
Sarah Gradidge; Joaquín Alcañiz-Colomer; Steve Loughnan |
| Publication Year: |
2023 |
| Collection: |
Anglia Ruskin University: Figshare |
| Subject Terms: |
Neurosciences; Science & Technology; Social Sciences; Life Sciences & Biomedicine; Behavioral Sciences; Psychology; Experimental; Neurosciences & Neurology; INFRA-HUMANIZATION; MEAT; ATTRIBUTION; DISSONANCE; EMOTIONS; INGROUPS; POWER; MIND; 1701 Psychology; 3209 Neurosciences; 5202 Biological psychology |
| Description: |
Dehumanization researchers have robustly shown that people display remarkable variability in attributing humanity to others and outgroups, often with negative consequences for the dehumanized. We argue that a similar process operates at an interspecies level; people attribute less mind and humanity to animals, often with negative consequences for animals' moral standing and treatment. We outline recent work demonstrating that people attribute farmed animals less mind and do so in a motivated fashion. Further, we examine evidence that this denial of mind undermines moral concern for farmed animals. Finally, we explore some of the avenues for improving both mind attribution and moral concern toward farmed animals. We conclude that while researchers have robustly demonstrated that a process similar to intergroup dehumanization occurs when omnivores think about farmed animals, we need more research to understand how this can be counteracted. |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
unknown |
| Relation: |
10779/aru.25112342.v1; https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Inhuman_animals_moving_dehumanization_into_the_domain_of_human_animal_relations/25112342 |
| Availability: |
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Inhuman_animals_moving_dehumanization_into_the_domain_of_human_animal_relations/25112342 |
| Rights: |
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.B520FD2C |
| Database: |
BASE |