Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Compensation and Necessity in War

Title: Compensation and Necessity in War
Authors: Bazargan-Forward, Saba
Source: Philosophers Imprint, vol 26, iss 0
Publisher Information: eScholarship, University of California
Publication Year: 2026
Collection: University of California: eScholarship
Subject Terms: 5003 Philosophy (for-2020); 50 Philosophy and Religious Studies (for-2020); 16 Peace; Justice and Strong Institutions (sdg); 2203 Philosophy (for)
Description: I argue that morally justified harms collaterally inflicted on civilians in war can yield compensatory duties – and that a failure to compensate post bellum renders in bello attacks retroactively unjust. Such attacks are unjust on the grounds that they violate the constraint of necessity, in the following way: the option of attacking-and-compensating is less harmful relative to the option of attacking-and-not-compensating (and typically no less effective at achieving the war’s aims). In making this point, I argue that we should evaluate the candidate courses of actions diachronically – that is, in a way that mereologically conjoins the ex ante attacks with ex post compensation. I then argue that a foreseeable risk of failing to compensate post bellum can affect the evidence-relative moral liability of those engaged in the in bello attacks. The upshot is that the moral significance of compensation for rights-infringements in war is not limited to jus post bellum, but also has profound effects on jus ad bellum and jus in bello. The US and select allies are in a position, even now, to affect the moral status of some of the military operations undertaken in the Middle East over the past two decades, by deciding whether to compensate those civilians whose rights were infringed. Neglecting to do so retroactively transforms tragic but potentially justified rights-infringements into gratuitously unjustified rights-violations. I end the article by addressing several practical quandaries that such a view seems to raise.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: unknown
Relation: qt7251h06r; https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7251h06r; https://escholarship.org/content/qt7251h06r/qt7251h06r.pdf
DOI: 10.3998/phimp.4140
Availability: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7251h06r; https://escholarship.org/content/qt7251h06r/qt7251h06r.pdf; https://doi.org/10.3998/phimp.4140
Rights: CC-BY-NC-ND
Accession Number: edsbas.B71A34CD
Database: BASE