Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Do behavioral observations make people catch the goal?:A meta-analysis on goal contagion

Title: Do behavioral observations make people catch the goal?:A meta-analysis on goal contagion
Authors: Brohmer, Hilmar; Eckerstorfer, Lisa; van Aert, Robbie C. M.; Corcoran, Katja
Source: Brohmer, H, Eckerstorfer, L, van Aert, R C M & Corcoran, K 2021, 'Do behavioral observations make people catch the goal? A meta-analysis on goal contagion', International Review of Social Psychology, vol. 34, no. 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.428
Publication Year: 2021
Collection: Tilburg University: Research portal
Subject Terms: goal contagion; goal pursuit; automatic inference; meta-analysis; publication bias; ESTIMATING EFFECT SIZE; CONDUCTING METAANALYSES; PURSUIT; POWER; REPLICATION; MOTIVATION; MOTIVES; OBJECT; MODELS
Description: Goal contagion is a social-cognitive approach to understanding how other people's behavior influences one's goal pursuit: An observation of goal-directed behavior leads to an automatic inference and activation of the goal before it can be adopted and pursued thereafter by the observer. We conducted a meta-analysis focusing on experimental studies with a goal condition, depicting goal-directed behavior and a control condition. We searched four databases (PsychInfo, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and JSTOR) and the citing literature on Google Scholar, and eventually included e = 48 effects from published studies, unpublished studies and registered reports based on 4751 participants. The meta-analytic summary effect was small - g = 0.30, 95%CI [0.21; 0.40], tau(2) = 0.05, 95%CI [0.03, 0.13] - implying that goal contagion might occur for some people, compared to when this goal is not perceived in behavior. However, the original effect seemed to be biased through the current publication system. As shown by several publication-bias tests, the effect could rather be half the size, for example, selection model: g = 0.15, 95%CI [-0.02; 0.32]. Further, we could not detect any potential moderator (such as the presentation of the manipulation and the contrast of the control condition). We suggest that future research on goal contagion makes use of open science practices to advance research in this domain.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 2397-8570; 2119-4130
Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/000612367900001; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/2397-8570; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2119-4130
DOI: 10.5334/irsp.428
Availability: https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/3b7b8c29-3add-4f06-85ca-490aabbd055d; https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.428; https://repository.tilburguniversity.edu/bitstreams/ece773f4-7b90-4490-a4ed-508d5e192637/download; https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85105033839
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.B9F7D514
Database: BASE