Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Feasibility and usability of a voice-based dietary recall tool in older adults: A pilot comparison with ASA-24

Title: Feasibility and usability of a voice-based dietary recall tool in older adults: A pilot comparison with ASA-24
Authors: Simone G Khandpekar; Rishank Singh; Caroline E Summerour; Jim Schwoebel; Xiaohui Liang; John A Batsis
Source: Digital Health, Vol 11 (2025)
Publisher Information: SAGE Publishing
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Subject Terms: Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics; R858-859.7
Description: Objective Dietary assessment is important for identifying patterns that can influence an older adult's medical conditions. Existing assessments are dependent on the recall limit of the current use of dietary tools. This pilot study aimed to compare the short-term usability and acceptability of a novel voice-based dietary recall tool (DataBoard) to the traditional Automated Self-Administered Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA-24) in older adults. Methods Participants aged over 65 years old, meeting specific criteria, were recruited through Research For Me and Research Match across a six-month period in 2023–2024. During the session on Zoom, they were randomly assigned to complete either a voice-based recall via DataBoard or use ASA-24 first, followed by a semi-structured interview. DataBoard enables survey completion using speech input through shared links. We obtained data on meal choices, participant feedback, and preferences for either method using a 1–10 rating scale (low to high agreement). Descriptive statistics and qualitative coding were conducted. Results We recruited 20 participants (mean age 70.5 ± 4.26 years, 55% female and 35% non-White). Feasibility and acceptability of DataBoard's voice-based recall were rated as 7.95/10 and 7.6/10. Participants rated the overall performance of DataBoard as easier than the ASA-24, with an average rating of 6.7/10. Participants preferred using DataBoard; they felt it could be used more frequently to report food than ASA-24 (mean 7.2/10). Dedoose analysis revealed preferences, challenges, and usability insights for DataBoard. Conclusion Older adults supported voice-based recall as a means to evaluate dietary intake. Further evaluation with larger cohorts of older adults could provide additional opportunities to create a better tool for food recall.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251393342; https://doaj.org/toc/2055-2076; https://doaj.org/article/445fb9183d31481cabf45bd3409bd3f0
DOI: 10.1177/20552076251393342
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251393342; https://doaj.org/article/445fb9183d31481cabf45bd3409bd3f0
Accession Number: edsbas.BC443D15
Database: BASE