Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Estimating the Social Visibility of Abortions in Uganda and Ethiopia Using the Game of Contacts

Title: Estimating the Social Visibility of Abortions in Uganda and Ethiopia Using the Game of Contacts
Authors: Giorgio, Margaret; Shiferaw, Solomon; Makumbi, Fredrick; Seme, Assefa; Kibira, Simon Peter Sebina; Nabukeera, Sarah; Anjur‐Dietrich, Selena; Yihdego, Mahari; Tadele, Niguse; Sully, Elizabeth
Contributors: David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Source: Studies in Family Planning ; volume 55, issue 4, page 291-314 ; ISSN 0039-3665 1728-4465
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Social network–based data collection methods that rely on third‐party reporting have emerged as a promising approach for measuring abortion in restrictive settings. In order for these methods to accurately measure abortion incidence, they must also assess the visibility of abortions within social networks. Failure to do so may result in estimates affected by transmission bias, caused by imperfect knowledge of all abortions within one's social network. In this paper, we present exploratory research that uses respondent‐driven sampling (RDS) and the game of contacts method to measure abortion visibility in four sites in Uganda and Ethiopia. We assess the existence of potential biases in the game of contacts estimate of abortion visibility in each site by conducting several internal and external validity tests. While these tests provided some promising results, other factors such as the representativeness of the RDS samples, direct versus indirect abortion knowledge transfers, and the generalizability of the study sites may have introduced biases into the final estimates of abortion visibility in this study. We conclude by making recommendations on how applications of this methodology could be improved to better estimate abortion‐related transmission bias.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12278
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12278; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/sifp.12278
Rights: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.BC9A9F1
Database: BASE