| Title: |
Cortico-spinal tDCS in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial followed by an open-label phase |
| Authors: |
Benussi A.; Cantoni V.; Grassi M.; Libri I.; Cotelli M. S.; Tarantino B.; Datta A.; Thomas C.; Huber N.; Karkkainen S.; Herukka S. -K.; Haapasalo A.; Filosto M.; Padovani A.; Borroni B. |
| Contributors: |
Benussi, A.; Cantoni, V.; Grassi, M.; Libri, I.; Cotelli, M. S.; Tarantino, B.; Datta, A.; Thomas, C.; Huber, N.; Karkkainen, S.; Herukka, S. -K.; Haapasalo, A.; Filosto, M.; Padovani, A.; Borroni, B. |
| Publication Year: |
2023 |
| Collection: |
Università degli studi di Trieste: ArTS (Archivio della ricerca di Trieste) |
| Subject Terms: |
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosi; Clinical trial; Motor neuron disease; Short interval intracortical inhibition; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation |
| Description: |
Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive disease for which no curative treatment is currently available. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether cortico-spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could mitigate symptoms in ALS patients via a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, followed by an open-label phase. Methods: Thirty-one participants were randomized into two groups for the initial controlled phase. At baseline (T0), Group 1 received placebo stimulation (sham tDCS), while Group 2 received cortico-spinal stimulation (real tDCS) for five days/week for two weeks (T1), with an 8-week (T2) follow-up (randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled phase). At the 24-week follow-up (T3), all participants (Groups 1 and 2) received a second treatment of anodal bilateral motor cortex and cathodal spinal stimulation (real tDCS) for five days/week for two weeks (T4). Follow-up evaluations were performed at 32-weeks (T5) and 48-weeks (T6) (open-label phase). At each time point, clinical assessment, blood sampling, and intracortical connectivity measures using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were evaluated. Additionally, we evaluated survival rates. Results: Compared to sham stimulation, cortico-spinal tDCS significantly improved global strength, caregiver burden, and quality of life scores, which correlated with the restoration of intracortical connectivity measures. Serum neurofilament light levels decreased among patients who underwent real tDCS but not in those receiving sham tDCS. The number of completed 2-week tDCS treatments significantly influenced patient survival. Conclusions: Cortico-spinal tDCS may represent a promising therapeutic and rehabilitative approach for patients with ALS. Further larger-scale studies are necessary to evaluate whether tDCS could potentially impact patient survival. Clinical trial registration: NCT04293484. |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| Relation: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/37977335; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:001118480400001; volume:16; issue:6; firstpage:1666; lastpage:1676; numberofpages:11; journal:BRAIN STIMULATION; https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3097083; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X23019514?via=ihub |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.brs.2023.11.008 |
| Availability: |
https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3097083; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.11.008; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X23019514?via=ihub |
| Rights: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; license:Creative commons ; license:Digital Rights Management non definito ; license uri:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ; license uri:iris.PRI00 |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.BE4FD1F0 |
| Database: |
BASE |