Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Definitions, acceptability, limitations, and guidance in the use and reporting of surrogate end points in trials: a scoping review

Title: Definitions, acceptability, limitations, and guidance in the use and reporting of surrogate end points in trials: a scoping review
Authors: Manyara, AM; Davies, P; Stewart, D; Weir, CJ; Young, AE; Wells, V; Blazeby, J; Butcher, NJ; Bujkiewicz, S; Chan, A-W; Collins, GS; Dawoud, D; Offringa, M; Ouwens, M; Ross, JS; Taylor, RS; Ciani, O
Publisher Information: Elsevier
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: Oxford University Research Archive (ORA)
Description: Objective To synthesize the current literature on the use of surrogate end points, including definitions, acceptability, and limitations of surrogate end points and guidance for their design/reporting, into trial reporting items. Study Design and Setting Literature was identified through searching bibliographic databases (until March 1, 2022) and gray literature sources (until May 27, 2022). Data were thematically analyzed into four categories: (1) definitions, (2) acceptability, (3) limitations and challenges, and (4) guidance, and synthesized into reporting guidance items. Results After screening, 90 documents were included: 79% (n = 71) had data on definitions, 77% (n = 69) on acceptability, 72% (n = 65) on limitations and challenges, and 61% (n = 55) on guidance. Data were synthesized into 17 potential trial reporting items: explicit statements on the use of surrogate end point(s) and justification for their use (items 1–6); methodological considerations, including whether sample size calculations were informed by surrogate validity (items 7–9); reporting of results for composite outcomes containing a surrogate end point (item 10); discussion and interpretation of findings (items 11–14); plans for confirmatory studies, collecting data on the surrogate end point and target outcome, and data sharing (items 15–16); and informing trial participants about using surrogate end points (item 17). Conclusion The review identified and synthesized items on the use of surrogate end points in trials; these will inform the development of the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials–SURROGATE and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials–SURROGATE extensions.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.013
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.013; https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:e122127d-c10f-4d66-90dc-8ce1cf8f831c
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; CC Attribution (CC BY)
Accession Number: edsbas.BEAFEF23
Database: BASE