Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Patient and Carer-Related Facilitators and Barriers to the Adoption of Assistive Technologies for the Care of Older Adults: Systematic Review

Title: Patient and Carer-Related Facilitators and Barriers to the Adoption of Assistive Technologies for the Care of Older Adults: Systematic Review
Authors: Malden S; McGill K; Guthrie B; Frost H; Shenkin SD; Ezike A; Bareham BK; Mercer SW; Pearce C; Wilson C; Underwood I; Vines J; Lewis S; O'Donnell A
Source: JMIR Aging, 2025
Publisher Information: JMIR Publications Inc.
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: Newcastle University Library ePrints Service
Description: © Stephen Malden, Kris McGill, Bruce Guthrie, Helen Frost, Susan D Shenkin, Adanna Ezike, Beth Bareham, Stewart W Mercer, Caroline Pearce, Cara Wilson, Ian Underwood, John Vines, Sue Lewis, Amy O'Donnell. Background: Assistive technologies (ATs) are used increasingly in community settings to assist in the care of older adults. Despite a rapid increase in the capabilities and uptake of these technologies, gaps remain in understanding the main barriers to their usage. Objective: This systematic review investigated the barriers and facilitators to the use of AT in the care of older adults. Methods: Six electronic databases were searched from January 2011 to March 2024. Primary studies were included if they used qualitative methods reporting findings related to barriers or facilitators to the implementation of AT (eg, ambient and wearable sensors, alarms, telehealth or mobile health [mHealth]) for older adults (from the perspective of either carers or older adults) in community settings. All data were screened independently by two reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). Data from each included study were synthesized using thematic synthesis, before barriers were mapped against the domains of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Results: Ninety-five studies were included in the review. The number of studies published in the field of barriers to AT use has increased 3-fold post-COVID-19 in comparison to the previous decade. Ten barriers—privacy, cost, insufficient knowledge, fear of misuse, usability, poor functionality, perceived lack of need, stigma, and lack of human interaction—were identified, as well as three facilitators—awareness of health benefits, targeted training, and user-centered design. Persistent barriers relating to all domains of the TAM were identified, with the majority of these relating to the “behavioral intention to use” domain (cost, privacy, stigma, and fear of misuse). The majority of studies had a moderate/high risk of bias. Conclusions: ...
Document Type: review
File Description: application/pdf
Language: unknown
Relation: https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/309587; https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/fulltext.aspx?url=309587/02910619-EA2A-4DBF-B7DE-80DBF143C79E.pdf&pub_id=309587
Availability: https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/309587
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.BF58AF0A
Database: BASE