Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Clinical Presentation and Causes of Prosthesis-Related Hypersensitivity Reactions: An Analysis of 225 Patients

Title: Clinical Presentation and Causes of Prosthesis-Related Hypersensitivity Reactions: An Analysis of 225 Patients
Authors: El Saadany, Tamara; Illi, Barbara; Furrer, Pascal Raffael; Fucentese, Sandro F.; Schenk, Pascal; Li, Nick; Lang, Claudia; Bärenfaller, Katja; Zhakparov, Damir; Brüggen, Marie-Charlotte
Source: International Archives of Allergy and Immunology ; volume 187, issue 3, page 299-307 ; ISSN 1018-2438 1423-0097
Publisher Information: S. Karger AG
Publication Year: 2025
Description: Introduction: Between 10% and 20% of all prosthesis patients experience implant-related complications within 1–2 years following surgery. Hypersensitivity to components within the prosthesis is a possible cause of these complications. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of prosthesis-related hypersensitivity (PRH) and identify possible associated risk factors. A retrospective, monocentric study was conducted at the University Hospital Zurich. Results: A total of 225 patients who underwent patch testing for suspected PRH between 2011 and 2021 were included. The mean age was 72 years; 34% were male and 65% were female. Knee pain was the most commonly reported symptom (85%), followed by eczematous skin lesions and joint instability (each around 20%), as well as redness or swelling (13–16%). In 67% of the patients undergoing patch testing, an allergy was diagnosed. Nickel was the most frequently identified allergen (31.5%), followed by vanadium chloride (13.7%) and gentamycin, an antibiotic, often added to bone cement. 60% of the PRH patients had a previously known contact allergy – 25.7% to metals and 34.6% to other substances. Among the metals, nickel was the most prevalent (19.5%), followed by silver (3.1%). This prevalence was significantly higher than in patients without a metal allergy diagnosis. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding overall or individual atopic comorbidities (present in approximately 40% of patients). Conclusion: A history of contact allergy may be an indicator of PRH. In contrast, clinical presentation and the consideration of atopic or non-atopic comorbidities in prosthesis patients with suspected PRH do not appear to provide helpful diagnostic clues. Based on our findings, PRH may represent an underestimated cause of postoperative complaints.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1159/000547103
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1159/000547103; https://karger.com/article-pdf/doi/10.1159/000547103
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.C15E4D2A
Database: BASE