| Title: |
The impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on primary care contact among vulnerable populations in England:a controlled interrupted time series study |
| Authors: |
Walter, Scott R; Salisbury, Chris; Scott, Lauren J; de Vocht, Frank; Macleod, John; Ben-Shlomo, Yoav; Curtis, Helen J; Sheikh, Aziz; Katikireddi, Srinivasa V; Mehrkar, Amir; Bacon, Sebastian; Hickman, George; Goldacre, Ben; Redaniel, Maria T |
| Source: |
Walter, S R, Salisbury, C, Scott, L J, de Vocht, F, Macleod, J, Ben-Shlomo, Y, Curtis, H J, Sheikh, A, Katikireddi, S V, Mehrkar, A, Bacon, S, Hickman, G & Goldacre, B & Redaniel, M T 2025, 'The impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on primary care contact among vulnerable populations in England : a controlled interrupted time series study', BJGP Open, vol. 9, no. 4, BJGPO.2025.0017. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0017 |
| Publication Year: |
2025 |
| Collection: |
University of Bristol: Bristol Reserach |
| Description: |
Background : UK COVID-19 lockdowns significantly affected primary care access and delivery. Little is known about whether lockdowns disproportionally impacted vulnerable groups, including people who misuse substances, people who have experienced domestic violence or abuse, those with intellectual disability, and children with safeguarding concerns. Aim : To evaluate the impact of UK COVID-19 lockdowns on primary care contact rates among vulnerable groups. Design & setting : Natural experimental design using all registered patients in the OpenSAFELY platform. Method : With approval from NHS England, we conducted controlled interrupted time-series analyses on records from 24 million patients in England between September 2019 and September 2021. Results : Pre-pandemic, primary care contact rates were 110.1 per 1000 patients per week. Following the initiation of the first lockdown (23 March 2020), there was a large reduction of 29–61 contacts per 1000 patients per week among vulnerable and general population groups. For patients with alcohol misuse, those aged ≥14 years with intellectual disability, and children with safeguarding concerns, this reduction was significantly more extreme than corresponding general populations (relative rate difference -23.8 [95% confidence interval {CI} = -39.8 to -7.7, P = 0.003], -24.6 [95% CI = -38.8 to -10.5, P |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| Relation: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/40500153; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/https://hdl.handle.net/1983/a36a95ad-66e4-47b2-92a7-cc2184d42024 |
| DOI: |
10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0017 |
| Availability: |
https://hdl.handle.net/1983/a36a95ad-66e4-47b2-92a7-cc2184d42024; https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/a36a95ad-66e4-47b2-92a7-cc2184d42024; https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0017 |
| Rights: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.C2ACEFF6 |
| Database: |
BASE |