Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Robotic versus open oncological gastric surgery in the elderly. a propensity score-matched analysis

Title: Robotic versus open oncological gastric surgery in the elderly. a propensity score-matched analysis
Authors: Garbarino G. M.; Costa G.; Frezza B.; Biancafarina A.; Balducci G.; Mercantini P.; De Prizio M.; Laracca G. G.; Ceccarelli G.
Contributors: Garbarino, G. M.; Costa, G.; Frezza, B.; Biancafarina, A.; Balducci, G.; Mercantini, P.; De Prizio, M.; Laracca, G. G.; Ceccarelli, G.
Publisher Information: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON, N1 9XW, ENGLAND
Publication Year: 2020
Collection: Sapienza Università di Roma: CINECA IRIS
Subject Terms: gastric cancer; gastric surgery; minimally invasive surgery; robotic surgery
Description: Although there is no agreement on a definition of elderly, commonly an age cutoff of ≥ 65 or 75years is used. Even if robot-assisted surgery is a validated option for the elderly population, there are no specific indications for its application in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted gastrectomy and to compare the short and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted (RG) versus open gastrectomy (OG). Patients aged ≥ 70years old undergoing surgery for gastric cancer at the Department of Surgery of San Donato Hospital in Arezzo, between September 2012 and March 2017 were enrolled. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed according to the following variables: age, Sex, BMI, ASA score, comorbidity, T stage and type of resection performed. 43 OG were matched to 43 RG. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the RG group (273.8 vs. 193.5min, p < 0.01). No differences were observed in terms of intraoperative blood loss, an average number of lymph nodes removed, mean hospital stay, morbidity and mortality. OG had higher rate of major complications (6.9 vs. 16.3%, OR 2.592, 95% CI 0.623–10.785, p = 0.313) and a significantly higher postoperative pain (0.95 vs. 1.24, p = 0.042). Overall survival (p = 0.263) and disease-free survival (p = 0.474) were comparable between groups. Robotic-assisted surgery for oncological gastrectomy in elderly patients is safe and effective showing non-inferiority comparing to the open technique in terms of perioperative outcomes and overall 5-year survival.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/33151485; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000586338700001; issue:Nov 5; firstpage:1; lastpage:9; numberofpages:9; journal:JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY; http://hdl.handle.net/11573/1463200
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01168-2
Availability: http://hdl.handle.net/11573/1463200; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01168-2
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.C76C0F16
Database: BASE