Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Does the Nutritional Composition of Dairy Milk Based Recovery Beverages Influence Post-exercise Gastrointestinal and Immune Status, and Subsequent Markers of Recovery Optimisation in Response to High Intensity Interval Exercise?

Title: Does the Nutritional Composition of Dairy Milk Based Recovery Beverages Influence Post-exercise Gastrointestinal and Immune Status, and Subsequent Markers of Recovery Optimisation in Response to High Intensity Interval Exercise?
Authors: I Russo; PA Della Gatta; Andrew Garnham; Judi Porter; LM Burke; RJS Costa
Publication Year: 2021
Subject Terms: Agricultural biotechnology not elsewhere classified; Nutrition and dietetics not elsewhere classified; Science & Technology; Life Sciences & Biomedicine; Nutrition & Dietetics; molecular nutrition; intestinal epithelium; neutrophil; inflammation; glycogen; protein synthesis; hydration; EXERTIONAL-HEAT STRESS; MUSCLE PROTEIN-SYNTHESIS; REPETITIVE GUT-CHALLENGE; CIRCULATORY ENDOTOXIN; RESISTANCE EXERCISE; SYSTEMIC ENDOTOXIN; PROLONGED EXERCISE; ULTRA-MARATHON; HEALTHY-YOUNG; FLUID BALANCE; 3208 Medical physiology; 4207 Sports science and exercise
Description: This study aimed to determine the effects of flavored dairy milk based recovery beverages of different nutrition compositions on markers of gastrointestinal and immune status, and subsequent recovery optimisation markers. After completing 2 h high intensity interval running, participants (n = 9) consumed a whole food dairy milk recovery beverage (CM, 1.2 g/kg body mass (BM) carbohydrate and 0.4 g/kg BM protein) or a dairy milk based supplement beverage (MBSB, 2.2 g/kg BM carbohydrate and 0.8 g/kg BM protein) in a randomized crossover design. Venous blood samples, body mass, body water, and breath samples were collected, and gastrointestinal symptoms (GIS) were measured, pre- and post-exercise, and during recovery. Muscle biopsies were performed at 0 and 2 h of recovery. The following morning, participants returned to the laboratory to assess performance outcomes. In the recovery period, carbohydrate malabsorption (breath H2 peak: 49 vs. 24 ppm) occurred on MBSB compared to CM, with a trend toward greater gut discomfort. No difference in gastrointestinal integrity (i.e., I-FABP and sCD14) or immune response (i.e., circulating leukocyte trafficking, bacterially-stimulated neutrophil degranulation, and systemic inflammatory profile) markers were observed between CM and MBSB. Neither trial achieved a positive rate of muscle glycogen resynthesis [−25.8 (35.5) mmol/kg dw/h]. Both trials increased phosphorylation of intramuscular signaling proteins. Greater fluid retention (total body water: 86.9 vs. 81.9%) occurred on MBSB compared to CM. Performance outcomes did not differ between trials. The greater nutrient composition of MBSB induced greater gastrointestinal functional disturbance, did not prevent the post-exercise reduction in neutrophil function, and did not support greater overall acute recovery.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: unknown
Relation: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30147911
Availability: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30147911; https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Does_the_Nutritional_Composition_of_Dairy_Milk_Based_Recovery_Beverages_Influence_Post-exercise_Gastrointestinal_and_Immune_Status_and_Subsequent_Markers_of_Recovery_Optimisation_in_Response_to_High_Intensity_Interval_Exercise_/20677233
Rights: CC BY 4.0
Accession Number: edsbas.C7FCE5D2
Database: BASE