Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Ultrasonography-guided Drainage Versus Surgical Drainage for Deep Neck Space Abscesses:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Title: Ultrasonography-guided Drainage Versus Surgical Drainage for Deep Neck Space Abscesses:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Authors: Alzaid, Mohammad; Ramadhan, Mohammed; Abul, Ahmad; Karam, Mohammad; Alsaif, Abdulmalik; Stapleton, Emma
Source: Alzaid, M, Ramadhan, M, Abul, A, Karam, M, Alsaif, A & Stapleton, E 2024, 'Ultrasonography-guided Drainage Versus Surgical Drainage for Deep Neck Space Abscesses : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis', The Journal of laryngology and otology, pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215124000501
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: The University of Manchester: Research Explorer - Publications
Subject Terms: Abscess; Cost Savings; Drainage; Length of Stay; Retropharyngeal Abscess; Ultrasonography
Description: Objective To compare ultrasonography-guided drainage (USD) versus conventional surgical incision and drainage (I&D) in deep neck space abscesses. Methods The study was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023466809) and adhered to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched. Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay and recurrence. Heterogeneity and bias risk were assessed, and a fixed effects model was applied. Results Of 646 screened articles, seven studies enrolling 384 participants were included. USD was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay (Mean Difference [MD] = -2.31, P < 0.00001), but no statistically significant difference was noted in recurrence rate compared to I&D (odds ratio [OR] = 2.02, P = 0.21). USD appears to be associated with cost savings and better cosmetic outcomes. Conclusion USD was associated with a shorter hospital stay, making it a viable and perhaps more cost-effective alternative. More randomised trials with adequate outcomes reporting are recommended to optimise the available evidence.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 0022-2151; 1748-5460
Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/38616333; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/0022-2151; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1748-5460
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215124000501
Availability: https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/52653d40-98f5-4fb9-8791-8d45942626f9; https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215124000501; https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/files/327424661/ultrasonography-guided-drainage-versus-surgical-drainage-for-deep-neck-space-abscesses-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis.pdf; https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85190878192; https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4fc35c70-a798-3869-b310-bcd6d8470f3e/
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.C82F18CE
Database: BASE