Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Improving prescribing practices with rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs): Synthesis of 10 studies to explore reasons for variation in malaria RDT uptake and adherence

Title: Improving prescribing practices with rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs): Synthesis of 10 studies to explore reasons for variation in malaria RDT uptake and adherence
Authors: Burchett, HED; Leurent, B; Baiden, F; Baltzell, K; Björkman, A; Bruxvoort, K; Clarke, S; Diliberto, D; Elfving, K; Goodman, C; Hopkins, H; Lal, S; Liverani, M; Magnussen, P; Mårtensson, A; Mbacham, W; Mbonye, A; Onwujekwe, O; Roth Allen, D; Shakely, D; Staedke, S; Vestergaard, LS; Whitty, CJM; Wiseman, V; Chandler, CIR
Source: urn:ISSN:2044-6055 ; BMJ Open, 7, 3, e012973
Publisher Information: BMJ
Publication Year: 2017
Collection: UNSW Sydney (The University of New South Wales): UNSWorks
Subject Terms: 3207 Medical Microbiology; 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences; 3202 Clinical Sciences; Malaria; Vector-Borne Diseases; Rare Diseases; Infectious Diseases; Health Services; Clinical Research; Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities; 7.1 Individual care needs; Infection; 3 Good Health and Well Being; Antimalarials; Artemisinins; Disease Management; Drug Prescriptions; Fever; Guideline Adherence; Health Personnel; Humans; Plasmodium falciparum; Practice Patterns; Physicians'; Prescription Drug Overuse; Reagent Kits; Diagnostic; Serologic Tests; Time Factors; TROPICAL MEDICINE
Description: Objectives The overuse of antimalarial drugs is widespread. Effective methods to improve prescribing practice remain unclear. We evaluated the impact of 10 interventions that introduced rapid diagnostic tests for malaria (mRDTs) on the use of tests and adherence to results in different contexts. Design A comparative case study approach, analysing variation in outcomes across different settings. Setting Studies from the ACT Consortium evaluating mRDTs with a range of supporting interventions in 6 malaria endemic countries. Providers were governmental or non-governmental healthcare workers, private retail sector workers or community volunteers. Each study arm in a distinct setting was considered a case. Participants 28 cases from 10 studies were included, representing 148 €.461 patients seeking care for suspected malaria. Interventions The interventions included different mRDT training packages, supervision, supplies and community sensitisation. Outcome measures Analysis explored variation in: (1) uptake of mRDTs (% febrile patients tested); (2) provider adherence to positive mRDTs (% Plasmodium falciparum positive prescribed/given Artemisinin Combination Treatment); (3) provider adherence to negative mRDTs (% P. falciparum negative not prescribed/given antimalarial). Results Outcomes varied widely across cases: 12-100% mRDT uptake; 44-98% adherence to positive mRDTs; 27-100% adherence to negative mRDTs. Providers appeared more motivated to perform well when mRDTs and intervention characteristics fitted with their own priorities. Goodness of fit of mRDTs with existing consultation and diagnostic practices appeared crucial to maximising the impact of mRDTs on care, as did prior familiarity with malaria testing; adequate human resources and supplies; possible alternative treatments for mRDT-negative patients; a more directive intervention approach and local preferences for ACTs. Conclusions Basic training and resources are essential but insufficient to maximise the potential of mRDTs in many contexts. Programme ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: unknown
Relation: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/unsworks_43702
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012973
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/unsworks_43702; https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/bitstreams/1b2994c6-b5da-479a-a2a5-b6eb40c9ea03/download; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012973
Rights: open access ; https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 ; CC BY ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ; free_to_read
Accession Number: edsbas.CAFC119B
Database: BASE