Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

The impact of estrogen status on the gut microbiome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Title: The impact of estrogen status on the gut microbiome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Saravinovska, Kristina; Santi, Daniele; Costantino, Francesco; Prete, Alessandro; Šojat, Antoan Stefan; Spaggiari, Giorgia; Ivović, Miomira; Lambrinoudaki, Irene; Armeni, Eleni; Jurišić, Aleksandar; Mihajlović, Sladjana; Vujović, Svetlana; Marina, Ljiljana V.
Source: Frontiers in Endocrinology ; volume 17 ; ISSN 1664-2392
Publisher Information: Frontiers Media SA
Publication Year: 2026
Collection: Frontiers (Publisher - via CrossRef)
Description: Background Estrogens have been proposed as modulators of gut microbiome (GM) composition, yet evidence from observational studies remains inconsistent. Objective This meta-analysis aimed to systematically summarise existing evidence on GM alterations in hypoestrogenic women – post-menopausal or premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) – compared to euestrogenic pre-menopausal controls. Methods PubMed, SCOPUS and Embase were searched through December 2024 for studies comparing GM characteristics between hypoestrogenic and pre-menopausal women. Primary outcome was α-diversity (Shannon index). Secondary outcomes included relative abundances of Bacteroidetes , Firmicutes , and the Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes ratio. Random-effects models were used for data synthesis. Results Out of 1092 studies screened, 7 met the inclusion criteria (n = 45 women with POI, n = 1222 post-menopausal women, n = 463 eustrogenic controls). No significant differences were observed in α –diversity (p=0.990), Bacteroidetes (p=0.440), or Firmicutes abundance (p=0.110) between hypoestrogenic and euestrogenic groups, irrespective of POI or postmenopause. Similarly, the Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes ratio showed no significant difference between the groups (p=0.400). Study heterogeneity was high (I² 61-99%). Conclusion Current evidence does not support consistent differences in GM diversity or major bacterial phyla between hypoestrogenic and euestrogenic women. Given the substantial heterogeneity, limited control of confounding factors, and variability in methodological quality, these findings should be interpreted with caution. High-quality, well-controlled studies are needed to better define the relationship between estrogen status and the GM.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: unknown
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2026.1780806
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2026.1780806/full
Availability: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1780806; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2026.1780806/full
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.CD2A2E04
Database: BASE