Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

OP01 Withdrawal of infliximab or anti-metabolite therapy in Crohn’s Disease patients in sustained remission on combination therapy: A randomized unblinded controlled trial (SPARE)

Title: OP01 Withdrawal of infliximab or anti-metabolite therapy in Crohn’s Disease patients in sustained remission on combination therapy: A randomized unblinded controlled trial (SPARE)
Authors: Louis J, E; Resche-Rigon, M; Laharie, D; Satsangi, J; Ding, N; Preiss, J; D’Haens, G; Picon, L; Bossuyt, P; Vuitton, L; Irving, P; Bouhnik, Y; Viennot, S; Lamb, C; Pollock, R; Baert, F; Nachury, M; Mathurin, F; Gilletta, C; Colombel, J F; Hertervig, E
Source: Journal of Crohn's and Colitis ; volume 16, issue Supplement_1, page i001-i001 ; ISSN 1873-9946 1876-4479
Publisher Information: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Year: 2022
Description: Background Combination therapy with infliximab and anti-metabolites is a standard option for patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). The implications of long term use of combination therapy may lead patients and clinicians to contemplate treatment de-escalation once steroid-free remission has been achieved. The aim of our study was to assess the relapse rates and time spent in remission over 2 years, after withdrawal of infliximab or anti-metabolite compared to continuation of combination therapy. Methods CD patients treated with a combination therapy of infliximab (IFX) and anti-metabolite > 8 months and in sustained steroid-free remission > 6 months were recruited in 64 centers in France, United Kingdom, Belgium, Sweden, Australia, Germany and The Netherlands. Patients were randomized into 3 arms - continuing combination therapy (arm A); stopping IFX (arm B); or stopping anti-metabolite (arm C). In case of a relapse [defined by CDAI and an objective marker of inflammation (CRP or fecal calprotectin)], patients were retreated by resuming infliximab in arm B or the anti-metabolite in arm C, according to a pre-defined scheme, including optimization of IFX up to 10 mg/Kg if necessary in all arms. The two co-primary endpoints were the relapse rate and mean survival time spent in remission over 2 years. A major secondary endpoint was treatment failure (complications or not recapturing remission). Results 254 patients were screened, 211 randomized, 5 withdrew consent and 1 was lost to follow-up, leaving 205 patients for the analysis - 67 randomized to arm A, 71 to arm B and 67 to arm C. Demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. The two-year relapse rates were 14% (IC95%: 4–23%) in arm A, 40% (IC95%: 28–51%) in arm B, and 10% (IC95%: 2–18%) in arm C (p=0.0003 arm B vs arm A and
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab232.000
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab232.000; https://academic.oup.com/ecco-jcc/article-pdf/16/Supplement_1/i001/42438566/jjab232.000.pdf
Rights: https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
Accession Number: edsbas.CEDD7E5
Database: BASE