Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Small Differences in Rehydration Volume Affect 24h Urinary Concentration

Title: Small Differences in Rehydration Volume Affect 24h Urinary Concentration
Authors: Johnson, Evan C.; Huffman, Ainsley E.; Yoder, Hillary A.; Dolci, Alberto; Perrier, Erica T.; Larson‐Meyer, D. Enette E.
Source: The FASEB Journal ; volume 32, issue S1 ; ISSN 0892-6638 1530-6860
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2018
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: OBJECTIVE Sub‐optimal water intake may be unavoidable in certain occupations, or when access to water is limited. Additionally, some individuals chronically consume low fluid volumes ad libitum despite free access to water. In all of these situations, low urine volume and high concentration indicate insufficient water intake. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to evaluate the impact of various volumes of increased water intake on 24h urinary hydration biomarkers (volume, Uvol; specific gravity USG; and osmolality, Uosmo) following three days of water restriction. METHODS 115 participants [56 women (31±9 y, 166±7 cm, 65±12 kg, 34±8 %BF); 59 men (32±8 y, 180±7 cm, 83±18 kg, 22±8 %BF)] volunteered to record all food and beverages consumed over 11 days (d). On d 1 through 7, participants consumed food and beverages ad‐libitum. On d 8 through 10, participants were restricted to 1 L of plain water in addition to their habitual food intake. On d 11, participants were randomly assigned to maintain plain water intake at 1 L (Wbev +0 ) or into one of four intervention groups in which plain water intake increased to 1.5 L (Wbev +0.5 ), 2.0 L (Wbev +1.0 ), 2.5 L (Wbev +1.5 ), or 3.25 L (Wbev +2.25 ). 24 h urine collections were completed at baseline (d 3), during fluid restriction (d 9 and 10), and during the increased water intake (d 11). Repeated measures ANOVA was utilized to determine the effect of the water restriction and the increased intakes on urinary hydration biomarkers. Within group, paired sample t‐tests were used post‐hoc to determine if urinary biomarkers returned to baseline values. RESULTS No differences existed between any groups for demographic or habitual intake variables at baseline (all F [4,114] < 1.5, all P >.206). Fluid restriction (d 8–10) resulted in decreased total fluid and total water intake (food & fluids) similarly in all groups (from 2652±1168 to 1006±59 mL·d −1 and from 3326±1224 to 1763±349 mL·d −1 , respectively; F [3,330] = 229.7, P < .001 and F [3,330] = 194.3, ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2018.32.1_supplement.763.2
Availability: http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2018.32.1_supplement.763.2
Rights: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Accession Number: edsbas.CFB2AC9
Database: BASE