Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

The premises of Condorcet’s jury theorem are not simultaneously justified.” Episteme 5

Title: The premises of Condorcet’s jury theorem are not simultaneously justified.” Episteme 5
Authors: Franz Dietrich; Jel Code D
Contributors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Source: http://edocs.ub.unimaas.nl/loader/file.asp?id=1310.
Publication Year: 2008
Collection: CiteSeerX
Description: to appear in Episteme- a Journal of Social Epistemology Condorcets famous jury theorem reaches an optimistic conclusion on the correctness of majority decisions, based on two controversial premises about voters: they are competent and vote independently, in a technical sense. I carefully analyse these premises and show that: (i) whether a premise is justi ed depends on the notion of probability considered; (ii) none of the notions renders both premises simultaneously justi ed. Under the perhaps most interesting notions, the independence assumption should be weakened. 1
Document Type: text
Language: English
Relation: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.594.518; http://edocs.ub.unimaas.nl/loader/file.asp?id=1310
Availability: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.594.518; http://edocs.ub.unimaas.nl/loader/file.asp?id=1310
Rights: Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
Accession Number: edsbas.D0257988
Database: BASE