| Title: |
Water quality assessment using the AREc32 reporter gene assay indicative of the oxidative stress response pathway |
| Authors: |
Escher, Beate I.; Dutt, Mriga; Maylin, Erin; Tang, Janet Y. M.; Toze, Simon; Wolf, C. Roland; Lang, Matti |
| Publisher Information: |
Royal Society of Chemistry |
| Publication Year: |
2012 |
| Collection: |
The University of Queensland: UQ eSpace |
| Subject Terms: |
Chemistry; Analytical; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; 2308 Management; Monitoring; Policy and Law; 2739 Public Health; Environmental and Occupational Health |
| Description: |
The reporter gene assay AREc32 is based on the induction of the Nrf2 mediated oxidative stress response pathway in the human breast cancer cell line MCF7, where eight copies of the antioxidant response element (ARE) are linked to a reporter gene encoding for luciferase. The Nrf2-ARE pathway is responsive to many chemicals that cause oxidative stress, among them a large number of pesticides and skin irritants. We adopted and validated the AREc32 bioassay for water quality testing. tert-Butylhydroquinone served as the positive control, phenol as the negative control and other reactive chemicals were assessed for their specificity. An environmentally relevant reference chemical, benzo(a)pyrene was the most potent inducer of all tested chemicals. The concentration causing an induction ratio (IR) of 1.5 (EC(IR1.5)) was chosen as the effect benchmark value. The assay was applied to 21 water samples ranging from sewage to drinking water, including secondary treatment and various tertiary treatment options (ozonation, biologically activated carbon filtration, membrane filtration, reverse osmosis, advanced oxidation, chlorination, chloramination). The samples were enriched by solid phase extraction. In most samples the oxidative stress response was far more sensitive than cytotoxicity. The primary and secondary treated effluent exceeded the effect threshold IR 1.5 at a relative enrichment factor (REF) of 1, i.e., the native samples were active. All tertiary treated samples were less potent and their EC(IR1.5) lay between REF 1 and 10. The Nrf2 pathway was induced at a REF of approximately 10 for surface waters and drinking water, and above this enrichment cytotoxicity took over in most samples and quenched the induction. The blank (ultrapure water run through the sample enrichment process) was cytotoxic at an REF of 100, which is the limit of concentrations range that can be evaluated. Treatment typically decreased both the cytotoxicity and oxidative stress response apart from drinking water treatment where chlorination ... |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| ISSN: |
1464-0325; 1464-0333 |
| Relation: |
orcid:0000-0002-5304-706X; orcid:0000-0001-5552-6315; 10822 |
| Availability: |
https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:290022 |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.D303EFD4 |
| Database: |
BASE |