| Title: |
Proactive Prescription-Based Fluid Management Versus Usual Care in Critically Ill Patients on Kidney Replacement Therapy (Probe-Fluid): A Pilot Clinical Trial Protocol |
| Authors: |
Shen, Alicia; Bouchard, Josée; Neyra, Javier A.; Lamontagne, François; Côté, Jean-Maxime; Clark, Edward G.; da Costa, Bruno R.; Gallagher, Martin; Adhikari, Neill K. J.; Silver, Samuel A.; Suri, Rita S.; Ostermann, Marlies; Neto, Ary Serpa; Bellomo, Rinaldo; Bagshaw, Sean M.; Wald, Ron; Beaubien-Souligny, William |
| Contributors: |
Fonds de Recherche du Québec – Santé; Canadian Institutes of Health Research |
| Source: |
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease ; volume 12 ; ISSN 2054-3581 2054-3581 |
| Publisher Information: |
SAGE Publications |
| Publication Year: |
2025 |
| Description: |
Background: Severe acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is complicated by fluid accumulation, making fluid removal a central component of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). However, the optimal fluid management strategy in patients receiving KRT remains unknown, and practice varies widely. Objective: To assess the feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing a protocol-based fluid-removal strategy with usual care in critically ill adult patients receiving KRT. The primary objective is to determine whether the intervention results in a difference in cumulative fluid balance from randomization to day five. Design: Open-label, multicentre, pilot randomized controlled trial. Setting: Centers in Canada, the United States, and Australia. Patients: We are enrolling 150 adults admitted to the ICU with AKI who have been receiving KRT for ≤48 hours or who are anticipated to commence KRT within the next 12 hours. Measurements: The primary outcome is the difference in cumulative fluid balance (mL) between treatment arms from randomization (day zero) to the end of day five. Secondary outcomes include feasibility metrics, patient outcomes, resource use, safety outcomes, and process measures. Methods: Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either protocol-based fluid management or usual care. The intervention consists of a prescription template updated at least once daily by the attending care team, specifying a 24-hour fluid balance target, a prescription for fluid removal using KRT, and daily re-evaluation of fluid intake. The intervention is continued until day five post-randomization, KRT discontinuation due to kidney recovery, or ICU discharge. Limitations: The application of the intervention relies on the clinical judgment of the attending care team, which may affect the fidelity of the intervention. Usual care may differ between institutions, which may lead to variability. The treatment teams are unblinded, however the statistician will be blinded to group ... |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| DOI: |
10.1177/20543581251391877 |
| Availability: |
https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581251391877; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20543581251391877; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/20543581251391877 |
| Rights: |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ; https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.D36247BB |
| Database: |
BASE |