Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Pragmatic functions of populis* in online political discourse: a case study on the Twitter discourse of Spanish politicians

Title: Pragmatic functions of populis* in online political discourse: a case study on the Twitter discourse of Spanish politicians
Authors: Shchinova Shchinov, Nadezda; Linguists’ Day of the LSB (Linguistic Society of Belgium)
Contributors: UCL - SSH/ILC - Institut Langage et Communication; UCL - SSH/ILC/PLIN - Pôle de recherche en linguistique
Publication Year: 2021
Collection: DIAL@USL-B (Université Saint-Louis, Bruxelles)
Subject Terms: online political discourse; pragmatic functions; Spanish; Twitter; disqualification
Description: This paper discusses online political discourse on populism and examines pragmatic functions of the term populis* in a corpus of political tweets from Spanish politicians and political parties posted in 2019. More specifically, four forms are analyzed—populismo/populismos (‘populism’/‘populisms’, singular and plural nouns), populista/populistas (‘populist’/‘populists’, singular and plural nouns and adjectives)—in the Twitter accounts of five political parties across the political spectrum (UP, PSOE, Cs, PP, VOX), as well as in the Twitter accounts of their leaders. There are several academic definitions of populism; moreover, the term is being used in different ways and its meanings are constructed and negotiated in discourse. Previous studies have examined populism as an ideology (Mudde, 2004), as a discursive strategy (Charaudeau, 2011) and as a “communication phenomenon” (de Vreese et al., 2018). These studies have shown that the term can be employed in a variety of contexts, it can be used with a positive and negative value, and it can be applied to politicians of different political leanings. Moreover, few empirical studies have analyzed the actual uses of the term in discourse (e.g. Brown & Mondon, 2020; Goyvaerts & De Cleen, 2020). The study of its uses by politicians can hence shed light on the meanings of the term, as well as on the variety of uses and forms of populis* in actual discursive practices. Moreover, the analysis of the pragmatic functions of the term in political discourse on Twitter will add to the growing body of research on how politicians use this social media platform to engage in political communication with its audience (Breeze, 2020), and as a tool for political campaigns, as well as for self-expression, self-positioning, and political identity construction (Roginsky & De Cock, 2015; Coesemans & De Cock, 2017). In this study, a corpus of political tweets with at least one token of populis* posted on the Twitter accounts of Spanish politicians and political parties in ...
Document Type: conference object
Language: English
Relation: boreal:252161; http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/252161
Availability: http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/252161
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.D4AD0C2
Database: BASE