Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Randomized controlled trial of plain English and visual abstracts for disseminating surgical research via social media

Title: Randomized controlled trial of plain English and visual abstracts for disseminating surgical research via social media
Authors: Chapman SJ; Grossman RC; FitzPatrick MEB; Brady RRW
Source: British Journal of Surgery, 2 October 2019
Publisher Information: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Publication Year: 2019
Collection: Newcastle University Library ePrints Service
Description: © 2019 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. BACKGROUND: Patients are increasingly taking an active role in the design and delivery of surgical research. Public communication of results should also be encouraged, but this is often limited to non-expert commentary. This study assessed the role of plain English abstracts disseminated via social media in engaging patients and clinicians in the communication of surgical research. METHODS: A three-arm randomized controlled trial with crossover of two intervention arms was performed. Manuscripts accepted for publication in BJS were allocated to one of three arms and disseminated via Twitter: plain English abstracts, visual abstracts and standard tweets. The primary outcome was online engagement (a composite of tweets, replies and likes) by members of the public within 14 days. The secondary outcome was online engagement by healthcare professionals. RESULTS: Forty-one manuscripts were randomized to plain English abstracts (14), visual abstracts (14) and standard tweets (13). The number of public engagements was low, with a mean of 1·8 (range 0-8), 2·5 (0-11), and 1·2 (0-4) for plain English abstracts, visual abstracts and standard tweets respectively. The mean number of engagements by healthcare professionals was 29·4 (6-66), 45·3 (6-161) and 28·8 (10-52) respectively. Overall, visual abstracts attracted a significantly greater number of engagements than plain English ones (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Online, public engagement with surgical research was low. Overall engagement (predominantly from healthcare professionals) was enhanced by the use of visual abstracts.ANTECEDENTES: Los pacientes están tomando cada vez más un papel activo en el diseño y en la difusión de la investigación quirúrgica. También se debe fomentar la comunicación pública de los resultados, pero a menudo ésta se limita a comentarios de personas no expertas. Este estudio evaluó el papel de los resúmenes redactados en un inglés sencillo difundidos a través de las redes sociales para ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: unknown
Relation: https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/261062
Availability: https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/261062
Accession Number: edsbas.D6D2BA0A
Database: BASE