Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Retrospective analysis of the impact of pre‐transplant implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator status on long‐term prognosis in heart transplant patients

Title: Retrospective analysis of the impact of pre‐transplant implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator status on long‐term prognosis in heart transplant patients
Authors: Dean, Matthew; Zoni, Cesar Rodrigo; Copeland, Laurel A.; Pickett, Christopher; Sudhakar, Chittoor B. Sai; Ravi, Yazhini
Source: Clinical Transplantation ; volume 37, issue 1 ; ISSN 0902-0063 1399-0012
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Background Sudden cardiac death (SCD) post‐heart transplantation affects 8%–35% of patients; however, the risk profile remains to be completely elucidated. While pre‐transplant ICDs are typically removed during transplantation, no information exists to suggest if this pre‐transplant risk stratification is also associated with post‐transplant outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of pre‐transplant ICD status on long‐term prognosis post‐heart transplant. Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried for all adult heart transplant recipients from 2010 to 2018. Patients were categorized as with versus without ICD prior to heart transplantation. Survival was compared using Kaplan‐Meier analysis. Proportional hazards regression analysis assessed the impact of ICDs adjusting for clinical and demographic covariates. Results Of 19 026 patients included, 78.6% ( n = 14 960) had received an ICD at time of registration. Patients with an ICD were older [54.9 (±11.6) years vs. 48.6 (±15.3) years, p < .001], less likely to be female [25.7% ( n = 3842) vs. 31.2% ( n = 1269), p < .001], and more commonly diabetic [29.3% ( n = 4376) vs 23.5% ( n = 954), p < .001]. Kaplan‐Meier analysis showed no difference in unadjusted survival trajectory by ICD status (chi‐square = .48, p = .49). Survival was unrelated to ICD status in the multivariable model (HR = .98; 95% CI .90–1.07). Conclusions Patients receiving an ICD pre‐transplant had a higher prevalence of risk factors for SCD than non‐ICD patients, yet ICD status prior to heart transplantation was not associated with a change in long‐term prognosis post‐heart transplantation.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14842
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14842; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ctr.14842; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/ctr.14842
Rights: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Accession Number: edsbas.DBE31BE
Database: BASE