Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Cutting technique of ACL-Reconstructed professional handball players: on-field kinematic assessment using IMUs

Title: Cutting technique of ACL-Reconstructed professional handball players: on-field kinematic assessment using IMUs
Authors: Mendicino M.; Zinno R.; Simonelli C.; Zaffagnini S.; Bragonzoni L.; Di Paolo S.
Contributors: Mendicino, M.; Zinno, R.; Simonelli, C.; Zaffagnini, S.; Bragonzoni, L.; Di Paolo, S.
Publisher Information: AMS Acta; ITA
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: Università degli Studi di Ferrara: CINECA IRIS
Description: Introduction Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is common among handball players, mostly occurring in non-contact cutting maneuvers [1]. While lab-based studies have identified several biomechanical risk factors, real-game duels in court settings remain unexplored [1]. In this regard, wearable technologies (IMUs) enable on-field assessments during dynamic tasks and ecologically detect potential injury risk factors. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanics of ACL-reconstructed (ACLR) and healthy handball players using IMUs during on-field sport-specific injuryrelated tasks. Methods Twenty-five professional (first division) handball players (age: 23.7 ± 3.9 years; 14 males), including 7 ACLR players (cleared for RTS>24 months), were tested in their home-team handball court. Players were asked to perform two highdynamic cutting tasks, one mimicking a change of direction with passive opponent and one in response to a real-game opponent (Figure 1). Both tasks were performed six times (three per limb) per player, with an overall of 300 trials collected. Based on dominant hand and movement direction, each trial was classified as either a classic sidestep change of direction (SSC) or a crossover (XOVER). Lower limb and trunk kinematics were recorded using eight IMUs (100 Hz, MTw Awinda, Movella), validated for high-dynamic movement analysis [2]. Joint kinematics was assessed in the three anatomical planes at key events of the cut foot contact window: initial contact (IC), peak of knee flexion (pKF), peak values (maximum and minimum), and range of motion (ROM). Analysis was conducted separately for movement type (SSC and XOVER), comparing healthy and ACLR players in active and passive movements. Two-tailed Student’s t-tests were used to assess between-group differences for each of the 75 extracted features, with Cohen’s d effect size reported alongside p-values. Results During XOVER, 23/75 variables differed significantly between ACLR and healthy players, and 26/75 during SSC. A greater pelvis and ...
Document Type: conference object
File Description: ELETTRONICO
Language: English
Relation: ispartofbook:Proceedings_SIAMOC_2025; XXV Congresso della Società Italiana di Analisi del Movimento in Clinica; firstpage:43; lastpage:43; numberofpages:1; https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2619012
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2619012
Accession Number: edsbas.DC29C065
Database: BASE