Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Genetic counseling service delivery models: A study of genetic counselors’ interests, needs, and barriers to implementation

Title: Genetic counseling service delivery models: A study of genetic counselors’ interests, needs, and barriers to implementation
Authors: Boothe, Emily; Greenberg, Samantha; Delaney, Christine L.; Cohen, Stephanie A.
Source: Journal of Genetic Counseling ; volume 30, issue 1, page 283-292 ; ISSN 1059-7700 1573-3599
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2020
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: As demand for genetic services grows, innovative genetic counseling service delivery models (SDMs) are needed. However, there is limited research on the barriers and needs of genetic counselors (GCs) interested in implementing new SDMs into their practice. In fall 2017, the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) Access and Service Delivery Committee’s SDM Subcommittee sent an online survey to the NSGC membership regarding the use of SDMs, which aimed to update the understanding of current SDM use and how this has changed over time. The survey included several questions with open‐response components assessing the need for new SDMs and barriers to implementation. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify common themes. Among 517 usable responses (16% response rate), more than half (54.4%) of respondents indicated their current SDM was inadequate to address the patient need in their area. Nearly two‐thirds (64.8%) indicated they were in the process of or planning to make changes to their SDM, although 40.6% did not have a specific timeline. Three major themes related to expanding access, reimbursement for services, and lack of support were identified from responses to questions about implementation of additional SDMs. Access included subthemes of geographic and physical location limitations, addressing long wait times, and the need to expand services. Reimbursement for services included issues with billing, genetic counselor licensure, and limitations due to the need for physician involvement in billing. The lack of support was evident with issues related to understaffing; difficulty gaining support at the administrative, institutional, or physician level; time constraints; and funding concerns. This study shows that GCs need education, tools, and resources to overcome barriers in implementing new or adapting current SDMs, and there is a need for policy change, including new billing and coverage models.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1319
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1319; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jgc4.1319; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/jgc4.1319
Rights: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Accession Number: edsbas.DC82C60C
Database: BASE