Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Sex as a Predictor of Outcomes for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between CAS and CEA

Title: Sex as a Predictor of Outcomes for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between CAS and CEA
Authors: Pasqualino Sirignano; Costanza Margheritini; Wassim Mansour; Francesco Aloisi; Carlo Setacci; Francesco Speziale; Eugenio Stabile; Maurizio Taurino; on behalf of the IRONGUARD-2 Study Investigators on behalf of the IRONGUARD-2 Study Investigators
Source: Journal of Personalized Medicine ; Volume 14 ; Issue 8 ; Pages: 830
Publisher Information: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: MDPI Open Access Publishing
Subject Terms: symptomatic carotid stenosis; carotid revascularization; carotid endarterectomy; carotid artery stenting; female sex; timing
Description: Purpose: Reporting gender-related outcomes for symptomatic carotid lesion revascularization after both endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures in an unselected group of patients treated by Italian Vascular Specialists. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients presenting with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis treated by CAS and by CEA. The primary endpoint was the 30 days any stroke occurrence rate; secondary endpoints were technical success, occurrence of transient ischemic attack (TIA), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and death. Demographic, clinical and procedural data were all noted in order to identify the outcome’s determining factor. Results: A total of 265 patients (193 males and 72 females) were enrolled, and of these 134 (50.5%) underwent CEA and 131 CAS (49.5%). At 30 days, the overall new stroke rate was 3.4% (one fatal), and no TIA, AMI or deaths were observed. Among strokes, seven major and two minor strokes were reported, with six after CEA and three after CAS (p = 0.32; OR: 2; CI95%: 0.48–8.17). The timing of revascularization has been found to be slightly associated with new stroke occurrence: seven out nine strokes were observed in patients treated within 14 days from symptom onset (5.5% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.08, OR: 3.8, CI95%: 0.77–18.56). Lastly, female patients presented a significantly higher risk of post-operative stroke compared to male patients: 6.9% vs. 2.1% (p: 0.05; OR: 3.52; CI95%: 0.91–13.52). Conclusions: Our experience seems to suggest that both CEA and CAS provide safe and effective results in treating patients presenting with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Regardless of the type of revascularization, female sex is an independent risk factor for stroke recurrence after treatment.
Document Type: text
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: Personalized Therapy in Clinical Medicine; https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm14080830
DOI: 10.3390/jpm14080830
Availability: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14080830
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.DC9A746A
Database: BASE