Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

A New Minimax Theorem for Randomized Algorithms

Title: A New Minimax Theorem for Randomized Algorithms
Authors: Ben-David, Shalev; Blais, Eric
Contributors: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institute for Quantum Computing (IQC) at the University of Waterloo
Source: Journal of the ACM ; volume 70, issue 6, page 1-58 ; ISSN 0004-5411 1557-735X
Publisher Information: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Publication Year: 2023
Description: The celebrated minimax principle of Yao says that for any Boolean-valued function f with finite domain, there is a distribution μ over the domain of f such that computing f to error ε against inputs from μ is just as hard as computing f to error ε on worst-case inputs. Notably, however, the distribution μ depends on the target error level ε: the hard distribution which is tight for bounded error might be trivial to solve to small bias, and the hard distribution which is tight for a small bias level might be far from tight for bounded error levels. In this work, we introduce a new type of minimax theorem which can provide a hard distribution μ that works for all bias levels at once. We show that this works for randomized query complexity, randomized communication complexity, some randomized circuit models, quantum query and communication complexities, approximate polynomial degree, and approximate logrank. We also prove an improved version of Impagliazzo’s hardcore lemma. Our proofs rely on two innovations over the classical approach of using Von Neumann’s minimax theorem or linear programming duality. First, we use Sion’s minimax theorem to prove a minimax theorem for ratios of bilinear functions representing the cost and score of algorithms. Second, we introduce a new way to analyze low-bias randomized algorithms by viewing them as “forecasting algorithms” evaluated by a certain proper scoring rule. The expected score of the forecasting version of a randomized algorithm appears to be a more fine-grained way of analyzing the bias of the algorithm. We show that such expected scores have many elegant mathematical properties—for example, they can be amplified linearly instead of quadratically. We anticipate forecasting algorithms will find use in future work in which a fine-grained analysis of small-bias algorithms is required.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1145/3626514
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1145/3626514; https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626514; https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3626514
Rights: https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background
Accession Number: edsbas.DD3E85B2
Database: BASE