Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Lack of association between screening interval and cancer stage in Lynch syndrome may be accounted for by over-diagnosis; A prospective Lynch syndrome database report

Title: Lack of association between screening interval and cancer stage in Lynch syndrome may be accounted for by over-diagnosis; A prospective Lynch syndrome database report
Authors: Seppala TT; Ahadova A; Dominguez-Valentin M; Macrae F; Evans DG; Therkildsen C; Sampson J; Scott R; Burn J; Moslein G; Bernstein I; Holinski-Feder E; Pylvanainen K; Renkonen-Sinisalo L; Lepisto A; Lautrup CK; Lindblom A; Plazzer J-P; Winship I; Tjandra D; Katz LH; Aretz S; Huneburg R; Holzapfel S; Heinimann K; Valle AD; Neffa F; Gluck N; De Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH; Vasen H; Morak M; Steinke-Lange V; Engel C; Rahner N; Schmiegel W; Vangala D; Thomas H; Green K; Lalloo F; Crosbie EJ; Hill J; Capella G; Pineda M; Navarro M; Blanco I; Ten Broeke S; Nielsen M; Ljungmann K; Nakken S; Lindor N; Frayling I; Hovig E; Sunde L; Kloor M; Mecklin J-P; Kalager M; Moller P
Source: Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, 28 February 2019
Publisher Information: BioMed Central Ltd
Publication Year: 2019
Collection: Newcastle University Library ePrints Service
Description: © 2019 The Author(s). Background: Recent epidemiological evidence shows that colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to occur in carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair (path-MMR) variants despite frequent colonoscopy surveillance in expert centres. This observation conflicts with the paradigm that removal of all visible polyps should prevent the vast majority of CRC in path-MMR carriers, provided the screening interval is sufficiently short and colonoscopic practice is optimal. Methods: To inform the debate, we examined, in the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD), whether the time since last colonoscopy was associated with the pathological stage at which CRC was diagnosed during prospective surveillance. Path-MMR carriers were recruited for prospective surveillance by colonoscopy. Only variants scored by the InSiGHT Variant Interpretation Committee as class 4 and 5 (clinically actionable) were included. CRCs detected at the first planned colonoscopy, or within one year of this, were excluded as prevalent cancers. Results: Stage at diagnosis and interval between last prospective surveillance colonoscopy and diagnosis were available for 209 patients with 218 CRCs, including 162 path-MLH1, 45 path-MSH2, 10 path-MSH6 and 1 path-PMS2 carriers. The numbers of cancers detected within < 1.5, 1.5-2.5, 2.5-3.5 and at > 3.5 years since last colonoscopy were 36, 93, 56 and 33, respectively. Among these, 16.7, 19.4, 9.9 and 15.1% were stage III-IV, respectively (p = 0.34). The cancers detected more than 2.5 years after the last colonoscopy were not more advanced than those diagnosed earlier (p = 0.14). Conclusions: The CRC stage and interval since last colonoscopy were not correlated, which is in conflict with the accelerated adenoma-carcinoma paradigm. We have previously reported that more frequent colonoscopy is not associated with lower incidence of CRC in path-MMR carriers as was expected. In contrast, point estimates showed a higher incidence with shorter intervals between examinations, a situation that may ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: unknown
Relation: https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/255901; https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/fulltext.aspx?url=255901/3E3E8512-6821-46BF-A555-AF372B1CA948.pdf&pub_id=255901
Availability: https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/255901
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.DE929A3E
Database: BASE