Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Validation of the Fugitive Emission Distributed Sampling (FEDS) system: A mobile, multi-inlet system for continuous emissions monitoring

Title: Validation of the Fugitive Emission Distributed Sampling (FEDS) system: A mobile, multi-inlet system for continuous emissions monitoring
Authors: Shaw, Jacob T.; Howes, Neil; Connolly, Jessica; Buculei, Dragos E.; Ryan, Jamie; Helmore, Jon; Yarrow, Nigel; Butterfield, David; Innocenti, Fabrizio; Robinson, Rod
Source: eISSN
Publication Year: 2026
Collection: Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
Description: The National Physical Laboratory (NPL) has developed and trialled a mobile and remotely-operated Fugitive Emission Distributed Sampling (FEDS) system for continuous measurements of emissions at the facility spatial scale. FEDS is capable of both locating and quantifying emission sources over long-term periods and has been deployed at sites around the UK to monitor methane emissions from the natural gas network, landfill, and waste treatment. This work presents assessment activities using a controlled release facility (CRF) to test the performance of the measurement system and two reverse dispersion models (Airviro and WindTrax) for emission quantification. The CRF was used to simulate a simple single-point methane emission source with constant release rate of 1 kg h −1 over four separate experiments. Emissions were quantified using prior knowledge of release timings as well as in the absence of this knowledge. High variability in wind direction was shown to negatively impact emission quantification accuracy (especially for Airviro). Emission results were improved by removing periods of high wind variability (low wind persistence) from analysis. Both models performed better when using daily-averaging periods for emissions (Airviro RMSE = 0.37 kg h −1 (37 % relative); WindTrax = 0.29 kg h −1 (29 %)) over shorter averaging periods, such as hourly data (Airviro RMSE = 0.77 kg h −1 (77 %); WindTrax = 2.19 kg h −1 (219 %)). Estimated emission rates were shown to be sensitive to the specified source release height for both models, with discrepancies in model release height relative to the true release height of more than 0.5 m yielding less accurate results.
Document Type: text
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-2025-1451
Availability: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1451; https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-1451/
Accession Number: edsbas.E64AC651
Database: BASE