| Title: |
The Surgical Algorithm for the AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification System |
| Authors: |
Lee,Yunsoo; Lambrechts,Mark; Narayanan,Rajkishen; Bransford,Richard; Benneker,Lorin; Schnake,Klaus; Öner, Cumhur; Canseco,Jose A.; Kepler,Christopher K.; Schroeder,Gregory D.; Vaccaro,Alexander R.; AO Spine Sacral Classification Group Members; MS Orthopaedie Algemeen; Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cells; Orthopaedie Opleiding |
| Publication Year: |
2024 |
| Subject Terms: |
AO Spine; classification; injury score; injury severity; pelvic fracture; sacral fracture; spine trauma; validation; Taverne; Orthopedics and Sports Medicine; Clinical Neurology |
| Description: |
Study Design. Global cross-sectional survey. Objective. To establish a surgical algorithm for sacral fractures based on the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) Spine Sacral Injury Classification System. Summary of Background Data. Although the AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification has been validated across an international audience of surgeons, a consensus on a surgical algorithm for sacral fractures using the Sacral AO Spine Injury Score (Sacral AOSIS) has yet to be developed. Methods. A survey was sent to general orthopedic surgeons, orthopedic spine surgeons, and neurosurgeons across the five AO spine regions of the world. Descriptions of controversial sacral injuries based on different fracture subtypes were given, and surgeons were asked whether the patient should undergo operative or nonoperative management. The results of the survey were used to create a surgical algorithm based on each subtype's sacral AOSIS. Results. An international agreement of 70% was decided on by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma experts to indicate a recommendation of initial operative intervention. Using this, sacral fracture subtypes of AOSIS 5 or greater were considered operative, while those with AOSIS 4 or less were generally nonoperative. For subtypes with an AOSIS of 3 or 4, if the sacral fracture was associated with an anterior pelvic ring injury (M3 case-specific modifier), intervention should be left to the surgeons' discretion. Conclusion. The AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification System offers a validated hierarchical system to approach sacral injuries. Through multispecialty and global surgeon input, a surgical algorithm was developed to determine appropriate operative indications for sacral trauma. Further validation is required, but this algorithm provides surgeons across the world with the basis for discussion and the development of standards of care and treatment. |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| File Description: |
text/plain |
| Language: |
English |
| ISSN: |
0362-2436 |
| Relation: |
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/454246 |
| Availability: |
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/454246 |
| Rights: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.F040C01A |
| Database: |
BASE |