| Title: |
Laparoscopy has better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma: A retrospective cross‐sectional study in a trauma referral hospital in Colombia |
| Authors: |
Gómez, Efrain J. I.; Vargas, Luis F. C.; Lozada‐Martinez, Ivan D.; Reyes, Mariana; Pedraza, Mauricio; Forero, Nicolas; Guardo‐Carmona, Daniela; Narvaez‐Rojas, Alexis R. |
| Source: |
Health Science Reports ; volume 5, issue 3 ; ISSN 2398-8835 2398-8835 |
| Publisher Information: |
Wiley |
| Publication Year: |
2022 |
| Collection: |
Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref) |
| Description: |
Background Abdominal trauma is one of the leading causes of death. In Colombia, few studies have evaluated the results on related factors and outcomes when comparing laparotomy versus laparoscopy in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma in a limited resources environment in a middle‐income country. Methods Retrospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in Bogota, Colombia from January 2018 to October 2020. Patients over 18 years old, hemodynamically stable with penetrating abdominal trauma without other body parts injuries, that underwent laparoscopy and/or laparotomy surgical exploration and treatment were included. Frequencies, percentages, correlations, and odds ratio were calculated. Results A total of 52 patients were analyzed (26 laparoscopy vs. 26 laparotomy). Stabbing injuries were more frequent in both groups (76.9%), as well as involvement of the anterior abdomen. None missed enterotomies were reported in the laparoscopy group. Surgical time and bleeding were significantly lower in the laparoscopic approach group (63 vs. 115 min and 65 vs. 992 cc, respectively). The time to oral intake and length of stay in the intensive care unit was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic management group (2 vs. 3 days and 1 vs. 4 days, respectively). Conclusions Surgical results found a safe scenario in a limited resources environment for the application of the laparoscopic technique to approach penetrating abdominal trauma in stable patients without missed injuries, low threshold of conversion to open approach, and additionally not presenting a higher percentage of complications compared with the laparotomy group in Colombia. Operative time, oral intake, and length of hospital stay were lower in the fully therapeutic laparoscopy group. |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| DOI: |
10.1002/hsr2.640 |
| Availability: |
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.640; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hsr2.640; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/hsr2.640 |
| Rights: |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.F0D698DB |
| Database: |
BASE |