Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Promoting activity, independence and stability in early dementia and mild cognitive impairment: the PrAISED research programme including an RCT

Title: Promoting activity, independence and stability in early dementia and mild cognitive impairment: the PrAISED research programme including an RCT
Authors: Harwood, Rowan H.; Goldberg, Sarah E.; van Der Wardt, Veronika; Brand, Andrew; Booth, Vicky; Di Lorito, Claudio; Hoare, Zoe; Hancox, Jennie; Bajwa, Rupinder; Burgon, Clare; Howe, Louise; Cowley, Alison; Bramley, Trevor; Long, Annabelle; Lock, Juliette; Bosco, Alessandro; Tucker, Rachael; Robertson, Kate; Ward, Marie; Ward, Andrea; Beck, Lyndsay; Harling, Martyn; Adams, Emma; O’Brien, Rebecca; Kearney, Fiona; Kowalewska, Katarzyna; Godfrey, Maureen; Dunlop, Marianne; Junaid, Kehinde; Thacker, Simon; Duff, Carol; Welsh, Tomas; Haddon-Silver, Annette; Gladman, John; Logan, Pip; Pollock, Kristian; Vedhara, Kavita; Hood, Victoria; Das Nair, Roshan; Smith, Helen; Tudor-Edwards, Rhiannon; Hartfiel, Ned; Ezeofor, Victory; Vickers, Robert; Orrell, Martin; Masud, Tahir
Publisher Information: NIHR Journals Library
Publication Year: 2026
Collection: University of Nottingham: Repository@Nottingham
Description: BackgroundHidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a long-term skin condition where evidence for management after first-line treatment fails is limited and practice varies across the UK. Medical and surgical treatment options are potential avenues of treatment. Furthermore, patient perspectives on HS treatments have received little attention in research to date.ObjectivesTo explore patients’ views and experiences of treatment for HS to inform clinical care.MethodsWe conducted a nested qualitative study within a prospective cohort study. Interviews with 35 participants were completed by telephone. Purposive sampling was undertaken. Framework analysis was used to develop themes.ResultsPast experiences and knowledge informed patient beliefs and whether an individual felt a treatment option was appropriate or a good ‘fit’ for them at a specific moment in time. Healthcare professional recommendations can influence a patient’s views and which treatment option they ultimately receive. Positive experiences were reported across all treatment types covered in the study. Negative experiences included mediation side-effects, lack of efficacy, delays to procedures and burden of wound care. However, even when personal experiences were not wholly positive for an individual, participants often believed the same treatment may potentially help others with HS, owing to the importance placed on personalization of treatment.ConclusionsThis paper has implications for how healthcare professionals discuss treatment options with people with HS. A ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach is inappropriate, and shared decision-making that elicits patients’ beliefs and preferences is crucial.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/44224175; Programme Grants for Applied Research; Volume 14; Issue 1; Pagination 1-63
DOI: 10.3310/PLNV0118
Availability: https://doi.org/10.3310/PLNV0118; https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/file/44224175/1/PrAISED%20Final%20Report%20HARWOOD%2012-12-24; https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/44224175
Rights: openAccess ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.F14735E3
Database: BASE