Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Perception of femininity and masculinity in voices as rated by transgender and gender diverse people, professional speech and language pathologists, and cisgender naive listeners

Title: Perception of femininity and masculinity in voices as rated by transgender and gender diverse people, professional speech and language pathologists, and cisgender naive listeners
Authors: Holmberg, Jenny; Södersten, Maria; Linander, Ida; Karlsson, Fredrik
Publisher Information: Umeå universitet, Umeå centrum för genusstudier (UCGS); Umeå universitet, Logopedi; Umeå universitet, Institutionen för epidemiologi och global hälsa; Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Medical Unit Allied Health Professionals, Section Speech and Language Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: Umeå University: Publications (DiVA)
Subject Terms: Femininity perception; Gender diverse; Masculinity perception; SLP; Transgender; Voice; Gender Studies; Genusstudier
Description: Objective: To explore whether cisgender naive listeners, transgender and gender diverse (TGD) listeners, and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) experienced in providing gender-affirming voice training differ in their perception of femininity and masculinity in voices. Methods: Samples of spontaneous speech were collected from 95 cisgender, and 37 TGD speakers. Three listener groups of cisgender naive (N = 77), TGD (N = 30), and SLP (N = 14) listeners, respectively, rated the voices on visual analog scales in two randomly ordered blocks, in which the perceived degree of femininity was rated separately from the perceived degree of masculinity. Results: The three listener groups showed similar patterns in their distribution of ratings on the femininity and masculinity scales. The TGD listeners’ mean ratings did not differ from the cisgender naive listeners’, whereas SLPs showed a small, but significant, difference in their ratings compared with both TGD and cisgender naive listeners and rated the voices lower on both the femininity and masculinity scales. Conclusion: The results differ from previous studies as TGD, and cisgender naive listeners rated the voices very similarly. The lower ratings of femininity and masculinity by the SLPs were likely influenced by their awareness of the complexity in the perception of voices. Therefore, SLPs providing gender-affirming voice training should be attentive to how their professional training may influence their perception of femininity and masculinity in voices and encourage discussions and explorations of the TGD voice client's perceptions of voices.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: Journal of Voice, 0892-1997, 2024; PMID 39179471
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.07.034
Availability: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-229333; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.07.034
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.F1FF67F
Database: BASE