Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Food Systems Sustainability: An Examination of Different Viewpoints on Food System Change

Title: Food Systems Sustainability: An Examination of Different Viewpoints on Food System Change
Authors: Gareth Haysom; E. Gunilla Almered Olsson; Mirek Dymitrow; Paul Opiyo; Nick Taylor Buck; Michael Oloko; Charlotte Spring; Kristina Fermskog; Karin Ingelhag; Shelley Kotze; Stephen Gaya Agong
Source: Sustainability, Vol 11, Iss 12, p 3337 (2019)
Publisher Information: MDPI AG
Publication Year: 2019
Collection: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Subject Terms: urban food system; food systems change; wicked problems; sustainability; urban food security; Environmental effects of industries and plants; TD194-195; Renewable energy sources; TJ807-830; Environmental sciences; GE1-350
Description: Global food insecurity levels remain stubbornly high. One of the surest ways to grasp the scale and consequence of global inequality is through a food systems lens. In a predominantly urban world, urban food systems present a useful lens to engage a wide variety of urban (and global) challenges—so called ‘wicked problems.’ This paper describes a collaborative research project between four urban food system research units, two European and two African. The project purpose was to seek out solutions to what lay between, across and within the different approaches applied in the understanding of each city’s food system challenges. Contextual differences and immediate (perceived) needs resulted in very different views on the nature of the challenge and the solutions required. Value positions of individuals and their disciplinary “enclaves” presented further boundaries. The paper argues that finding consensus provides false solutions. Rather the identification of novel approaches to such wicked problems is contingent of these differences being brought to the fore, being part of the conversation, as devices through which common positions can be discovered, where spaces are created for the realisation of new perspectives, but also, where difference is celebrated as opposed to censored.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3337; https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050; https://doaj.org/article/5762d5cf295c4497a7c344f025c3d415
DOI: 10.3390/su11123337
Availability: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123337; https://doaj.org/article/5762d5cf295c4497a7c344f025c3d415
Accession Number: edsbas.F31DA63C
Database: BASE