Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Artificial Intelligence Language Model Performance for Rapid Intraoperative Queries in Plastic Surgery: ChatGPT and the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap

Title: Artificial Intelligence Language Model Performance for Rapid Intraoperative Queries in Plastic Surgery: ChatGPT and the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap
Authors: Atkinson C. J.; Seth I.; Xie Y.; Ross R. J.; Hunter-Smith D. J.; Rozen W. M.; Cuomo R.
Contributors: Atkinson, C. J.; Seth, I.; Xie, Y.; Ross, R. J.; Hunter-Smith, D. J.; Rozen, W. M.; Cuomo, R.
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: Università degli Studi di Siena: USiena air
Subject Terms: artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; DIEP; intraoperative; large language model; plastic surgery
Description: Background: The integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare has led to the development of large language models that can address various medical queries, including intraoperatively. This study investigates the potential of ChatGPT in addressing intraoperative questions during the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap procedure. Methods: A series of six intraoperative questions specific to the DIEP flap procedure, derived from real-world clinical scenarios, were proposed to ChatGPT. A panel of four experienced board-certified plastic surgeons evaluated ChatGPT’s performance in providing accurate, relevant, and comprehensible responses. Results: The Likert scale demonstrated to be medically accurate, systematic in presentation, and logical when providing alternative solutions. The mean readability score of the Flesch Reading Ease Score was 28.7 (±0.8), the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level was 12.4 (±0.5), and the Coleman–Liau Index was 14.5 (±0.5). Suitability-wise, the DISCERN score of ChatGPT was 48 (±2.5) indicating suitable and comprehensible language for experts. Conclusions: Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT can serve as a supplementary tool for surgeons to offer valuable insights and foster intraoperative problem-solving abilities. However, it lacks consideration of individual patient factors and surgical nuances. Nevertheless, further refinement of its training data and rigorous scrutiny under experts to ensure the accuracy and up-to-date nature of the information holds the potential for it to be utilized in the surgical field.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: ELETTRONICO
Language: English
Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/38337594; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:001160071600001; volume:13; issue:3; numberofpages:10; journal:JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE; https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1276085; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10856538/
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030900
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1276085; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030900; https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/3/900; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10856538/
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; license:Creative commons ; license uri:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.F428AD59
Database: BASE