Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Current Practices and Evidence of Aspirin Usage in Microvascular Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Title: Current Practices and Evidence of Aspirin Usage in Microvascular Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Authors: Azam, Faraaz; Awaida, Cyril; Dogaroiu, Anca; Odobescu, Andrei
Source: Microsurgery ; volume 45, issue 1 ; ISSN 0738-1085 1098-2752
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Background Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) has been used in reconstructive microsurgery since the inception of the field. However, when compared to placebo groups, its efficacy is not confirmed. In our study, we hypothesize that the utility of ASA postoperatively in microvascular surgery is not associated with improved outcomes. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS according to PRISMA guidelines. Documentation of antiplatelet regimens and postoperative complications were the primary endpoints. Results Four articles met inclusion criteria including a total of 1196 patients. There were 637 patients who received aspirin and 559 patients who did not. The average age was not found to be significantly different between the two groups ( p > 0.05). In terms of flap type, patients undergoing DIEP had a significantly higher likelihood of receiving aspirin, whereas patients undergoing fibula flaps had a lower rate of aspirin usage ( p < 0.05). TRAM, anterolateral thigh flaps, SIEA, and radial forearm flaps were equally distributed between the two groups ( p > 0.05). A total of 317 complications were noted across both groups. Total complication rate, complete flap loss, and venous/arterial thrombosis rate were not found to be significantly different between the two groups ( p > 0.05). Hematoma rate was found to be significantly higher in the group receiving aspirin when compared to the control (RR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.19–2.44). Conclusion Aspirin usage did not confer significant advantage in preventing postoperative complication rates and increased rates of hematoma formation.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/micr.70029
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.70029; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/micr.70029
Rights: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.F66BC072
Database: BASE