Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Anticipating potential bottlenecks in adaptive proton FLASH therapy: a ridge filter reuse strategy

Title: Anticipating potential bottlenecks in adaptive proton FLASH therapy: a ridge filter reuse strategy
Authors: Roberfroid, Benjamin; Chocan Vera, Macarena; Draguet, Camille; Lee, John Aldo; Barragan Montero, Ana Maria; Sterpin, Edmond
Contributors: UCL - SSS/IREC/MIRO - Pôle d'imagerie moléculaire, radiothérapie et oncologie
Source: Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 70, no.6, p. x (2025)
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: DIAL@USL-B (Université Saint-Louis, Bruxelles)
Subject Terms: conformal FLASH; FLASH; online adaptation; proton therapy; ridge filter; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning; Computer-Assisted; Radiotherapy; Intensity-Modulated; Tomography; X-Ray Computed; Adaptive filtering; Adaptive filters; Arthroplasty; Nuclear medicine; Beam-scanning; Dose rate; Intensity modulated proton therapies; On-line adaptation; Pencil beam; Reuse strategy
Description: Objective. Achieving FLASH dose rate with pencil beam scanning intensity modulated proton therapy is challenging. However, utilizing a single energy layer with a ridge filter (RF) can maintain dose rate and conformality. Yet, changes in patient anatomy over the treatment course can render the RF obsolete. Unfortunately, creating a new RF is time-consuming, thus, incompatible with online adaptation. To address this, we propose to re-optimize the spot weights while keeping the same initial RF. Approach. Data from six head and neck cancer patients with a repeated computed tomography (CT2) were used. FLASH treatment plans were generated with three methods on CT2: ‘full-adaptation’ (FA), optimized from scratch with a new RF; ‘spot-adaptation only’ (SAO), re-using initial RF but adjusting plan spot weights; and ‘no adaptation’ (NoA) where the dose from initial plans on initial CT (CT1) was recomputed on CT2. The prescribed dose per fraction was 9 Gy. Different beam angles were tested for each CT2 (1 beam per fraction). The FA, SAO and NoA plans were then compared on CT2. Main results. Fractions with SAO showed a median decrease of 0.05 Gy for D98% and a median increase of 0.03 Gy for D2% of CTV when compared to their homologous FA plans on nominal case. Median conformity number decreased by 0.03. Median max dose to spinal cord increased by 0.09 Gy. The largest median increase in mean dose to organs was 0.03 Gy to the mandible. The largest observed median difference in organs receiving a minimal dose rate of 40 Gy s−1 was 0.5% for the mandible. Up to 16 of the 20 evaluated SAO fractions were thus deemed clinically acceptable, with up to 8 NoA plans already acceptable before adaptation. Significance. Proposed SAO workflow showed that for most of our evaluated plans, daily reprinting of RF was not necessary. © 2025 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: boreal:302894; https://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/302894
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/adb9b2
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/302894; https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adb9b2
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.F6D55FD8
Database: BASE